I think the Slackware community would like this file manager
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Well I finally got around to installing it and playing around with it. It's nice and I am comfortable with vi, but, mc is still my preferred CLI file manager.
I can agree whole heartedly. Just about anything you say is considered racists or offensive because people are so sensitive. I can't be around people who cry and complain about everything. [SIS] Schit is Sad!!
I'm curious as to how you think this is helpful or relevant enough to warrant posting -- everybody here who does not think fff should be included thus far has a good reason.
I'm curious as to how you think this is helpful or relevant enough to warrant posting -- everybody here who does not think fff should be included thus far has a good reason.
I was agreeing with a post and quoted it. You seem to be crying and complaining being all sensitive and whatnot. Leave me alone.
Is this relevant enough since I'm quoting your post as well?
Last edited by PROBLEMCHYLD; 02-26-2020 at 09:06 AM.
I despise censorship and find it incredibly inane that so many people still get upset over a specific word but not upset about the thing itself that word describes. That said I think the Author should rename it "[Expletive!] File Manager" or just "{Expletive!}" 8 ^ P
I would have suggested "FFF File Manager". Or would that be too unoriginal?
Distribution: openSUSE, Raspbian, Slackware. Previous: MacOS, Red Hat, Coherent, Consensys SVR4.2, Tru64, Solaris
Posts: 2,803
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi
That looks pretty cool, but to be honest I think the name alone will keep it out of Slackware...
I still recall the brouhaha in some circles over the inclusion in National Semiconductor's parts catalog of the "Damn Fast Operational Amplifier" back in the '80s. I'm guessing that those folks would have a literal stroke over this application's name. :^)
As a positive aspect of the name, it has probably given this application way more attention than it otherwise would have gotten, at least here.
Anyway, regarding the application itself, unless it can replace the functionality of Midnight Commander (including accessing remote machines), I'm not interested. Based on the video, it doesn't even support multiple panes or a command line. So, while it may be nifty, I don't see much that would warrant its inclusion.
Last edited by montagdude; 02-26-2020 at 10:57 AM.
Distribution: Slackware 15.0 x64, Slackware Live 15.0 x64
Posts: 618
Rep:
Meh...give me my krusader and I'll be happy. Yeah, fast like that file manager is okay, but *I* won't be able to do things any faster than I can now, so krusader works just fine and is fast also - not as fast as fff, but good enough. Besides that too, mc is 'fast' and I like it too over that fff, so far as I can tell.
I'm curious as to how you think this is helpful or relevant enough to warrant posting -- everybody here who does not think fff should be included thus far has a good reason.
Be careful though in defining what constitutes "good reason". I think PatV is wise to not take on any unnecessary negative baggage even if it does cave in to inanity. Let them deal with their inanity... "When in Rome...." right? However if you think "good reason" is because you find the word "fucking" offensive yourself you might benefit by researching exactly what makes for expletives. They change all the time since by design they require an ability to shock.
One of my Grandmothers was offended by medical words used to describe body parts, quite literally like even "navel". To her that was tantamount to cursing and only references like "bellybutton" were acceptable in "polite company". I've heard some Christian city dwelers say they avoid swearing by using words like "merde" instead of "shit". I suppose they assume God doesn't translate French This is clearly prejudice and not over an actual thing but a symbol for a thing. A great number of accepted expletives and obscenities in the UK and US are hangovers literally from as far back as the Norman Conquest when all Anglo Saxon words were considered barbaric. The word "barbaric" itself is derived from a Roman pejorative describing foreign languages as "bar bar" revealing far more about Roman ignorance and prejudice than the "barbarians" they castigated and denigrated.
Be careful though in defining what constitutes "good reason". I think PatV is wise to not take on any unnecessary negative baggage even if it does cave in to inanity. Let them deal with their inanity... "When in Rome...." right? However if you think "good reason" is because you find the word "fucking" offensive yourself you might benefit by researching exactly what makes for expletives. They change all the time since by design they require an ability to shock.
One of my Grandmothers was offended by medical words used to describe body parts, quite literally like even "navel". To her that was tantamount to cursing and only references like "bellybutton" were acceptable in "polite company". I've heard some Christian city dwelers say they avoid swearing by using words like "merde" instead of "shit". I suppose they assume God doesn't translate French This is clearly prejudice and not over an actual thing but a symbol for a thing. A great number of accepted expletives and obscenities in the UK and US are hangovers literally from as far back as the Norman Conquest when all Anglo Saxon words were considered barbaric. The word "barbaric" itself is derived from a Roman pejorative describing foreign languages as "bar bar" revealing far more about Roman ignorance and prejudice than the "barbarians" they castigated and denigrated.
I'm not personally offended by cursing. I also am fully aware of the etymology of "barbarian." I don't believe anyone here has expressed that their reasoning for a lack of inclusion is that they are personally offended, only that it can generate image issues or that the file manager isn't better or more needed than, say, mc.
Meh...give me my krusader and I'll be happy. Yeah, fast like that file manager is okay, but *I* won't be able to do things any faster than I can now, so krusader works just fine and is fast also - not as fast as fff, but good enough. Besides that too, mc is 'fast' and I like it too over that fff, so far as I can tell.
I like nnn. UX is a bit clunky, but it's performant and usable.
There's also lf, but I don't have an opinion on it yet.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.