LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2021, 09:12 AM   #1
HalseyTaylor
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2018
Distribution: Crux
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Farewell Slackware


After 25 years of using Slackware, it's time to move on. My thanks to Pat and all the others who kept Slack going over the years.

Slackware is a great learning tool for Linux. Those new to Linux can set up and get a solid desktop distribution without a lot of grief. Whenever a Win/Mac user asks which distribution they should get to start learning Linux, I'll continue to recommend Slackware.

Migrated to Crux. It has proven to be lightweight, fast, versatile, and easily customized. The 64/32-bit coexistence is excellent.

Good Luck,
Halsey
 
Old 04-25-2021, 10:05 AM   #2
igadoter
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: wroclaw, poland
Distribution: many, primary Slackware
Posts: 2,717
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625
Said the same many times. Always was back. That damned Slackware made me its slave.
 
12 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-25-2021, 10:26 AM   #3
Regnad Kcin
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2014
Location: Beijing
Distribution: Slackware 64 -current .
Posts: 663

Rep: Reputation: 460Reputation: 460Reputation: 460Reputation: 460Reputation: 460
Halsey W. Taylor invented the non-squirting drinking fountain. In 1896, Taylor's father died from typhoid fever. This illness is principally spread through contaminated drinking water. Several years later, while working as a plant superintendent for the Packard Motor Car Company, Taylor realized numerous workers were becoming sick with dysentery. He believed contaminated drinking water was the chief reason for the spreading illness.

Taylor determined to develop a drinking fountain that was sanitary and would not contribute to the spreading of various illnesses. By 1912, he had developed a drinking fountain that he claimed was much more sanitary. He began to manufacture the drinking fountains in his hometown of Warren, Ohio. Taylor continued to improve his product, and during World War I, he invented the "Double Bubbler" drinking fountain. This fountain dispensed two streams of water in an arc. Previously, drinkers commonly had to place their mouths on or near the faucet, helping spread germs. With Taylor's drinking faucet, the arc of water allowed drinkers to be several inches away from the faucet, reducing the spread of illnesses.

With the invention of the Double Bubbler, demand soared for Taylor's drinking fountains. During the 1920s and 1930s, Taylor's company, which was named Halsey Taylor, manufactured more than eighty percent of the drinking fountains in the United States. Halsey Taylor continues to manufacture fountains today, although the company is now located in Oak Brook, Illinois.

----

"The Crux of the Biscuit (onion) is the Apostrophe" - Frank V. Zappa
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-25-2021, 11:35 AM   #4
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,591
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455
I can understand that people who like Slackware like Crux as well. They're quite similar in many ways. In fact the Crux devs are always having to explain that Crux isn't based on Slackware in any way. For anyone that's interested, here is a quick comparison.

Code:
Crux                                                  Slackware
Source-based                                          Binary
Internally simple                                     Internally simple
Command-line installer                                Command-line installer
Simple dependency checking (no central database)      No dependency checking
You start small and build up                          Full install recommended 
Binary package tools                                  Script-based package tools
Build uses a provided script                          Build uses a provided slackbuild script
Big desktops only available from private repos        KDE is included as standard
32-, 64- and multilib available                       32-, 64- and multilib available
One big difference is the way Crux handles kernels. The installation disc provides kernel source code and you configure and build your own binaries. If you build in the necessary drivers, you won't need an initrd. But if you need a new kernel at any time, you must get source code from kernel.org because Crux doesn't provide kernel updates.

Last edited by hazel; 04-25-2021 at 11:57 AM. Reason: Added paragraph
 
13 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-25-2021, 11:38 AM   #5
Emerson
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Distribution: Gentoo ~amd64
Posts: 7,661

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thank you, hazel! I was curious about Crux but didn't think my question would fit in here.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-25-2021, 11:51 AM   #6
drgibbon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2014
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 1,221

Rep: Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943
Adios Halsey, hope Crux goes well for you.
 
Old 04-25-2021, 11:58 AM   #7
keithpeter
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2015
Location: 52:30N 1:55W
Distribution: Slackware 15.0, OpenBSD 7.4
Posts: 310

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalseyTaylor View Post
Slackware is a great learning tool for Linux. Those new to Linux can set up and get a solid desktop distribution without a lot of grief.
Whilst happy that Mr Taylor has found a system that he approves of, I think that some details of Mr Taylor's hardware and main use cases would increase the value of his post.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-25-2021, 12:15 PM   #8
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalseyTaylor View Post
Migrated to Crux. It has proven to be lightweight, fast, versatile, and easily customized. The 64/32-bit coexistence is excellent.
Yes, CRUX is nice, and I agree about the 32/64 architecture: much nicer than the FHS way of doing things, or having to merge Eric's multilib packages.

Having said that, I have found some rough edges with CRUX, so it's not all rainbows and unicorns.

Anyway, best of luck, and if it doesn't work out, remember you can always come back. Slackware will still be here.

P.S. CRUX is currently my daily-drive, though I'm still maintaining my slackware install too.

Last edited by GazL; 04-25-2021 at 12:19 PM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-25-2021, 12:23 PM   #9
igadoter
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: wroclaw, poland
Distribution: many, primary Slackware
Posts: 2,717
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625
CRUX subforum for Slackware users.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-25-2021, 12:33 PM   #10
hitest
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Void, Debian, Slackware, VMs
Posts: 7,342

Rep: Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746
Enjoy CRUX! We'll be here if you wish to come back.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-25-2021, 12:34 PM   #11
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
One big difference is the way Crux handles kernels. The installation disc provides kernel source code and you configure and build your own binaries. If you build in the necessary drivers, you won't need an initrd. But if you need a new kernel at any time, you must get source code from kernel.org because Crux doesn't provide kernel updates.
Just to touch on that, when I first got started I borrowed both the kernel and initrd from slackware to get me booted into CRUX.
 
4 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-25-2021, 03:48 PM   #12
solarfields
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: slackalaxy.com
Distribution: Slackware, CRUX
Posts: 1,449

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
I played with CRUX some 10 years ago. At the kernel compile step I just used Slackware's .config file and included the file system's driver. My impression of CRUX: a wonderfully designed system, implemented in not so wonderful way. Long story, may be it was just me.

Anyway, I learned how to make my own ports and couple of months later when I decided I preferred Slackware, I thought that creating SlackBuilds would not be much more difficult than the ports. So, I joined SBo thanks to CRUX in a way.
 
Old 04-25-2021, 03:56 PM   #13
ivandi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Québec, Canada
Distribution: CRUX, Debian
Posts: 528

Rep: Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866
Quote:
Originally Posted by igadoter View Post
Said the same many times. Always was back. That damned Slackware made me its slave.
Most clueless bums here say so.


Cheers.
 
Old 04-25-2021, 04:14 PM   #14
Daedra
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Springfield, MO
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 2,687

Rep: Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375
He'll be back lol
 
Old 04-25-2021, 04:21 PM   #15
akus
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalseyTaylor View Post
Migrated to Crux. It has proven to be lightweight, fast, versatile, and easily customized. The 64/32-bit coexistence is excellent.
Well, you decided to let us know about switching from Slackware to another distro, but did not provide specific reasons.
Is Slackware not lightweight enough? not fast enough? Not versatile? Not easily customized? Is the 64/32 bit coexistence in Crux much better?
There is probably at least one real specific reason for your switch. It will be constructive and interesting it you are more specific.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Farewell Slackware, farewell LQ ottavio Slackware 90 09-22-2013 10:29 PM
Farewell thank you note obby LQ Suggestions & Feedback 5 12-22-2005 05:16 PM
farewell GUI, i hardly knew yee HeLLWiZerD Linux - Newbie 5 09-20-2005 09:14 AM
Farewell floppy drive linuxfond Linux - Hardware 2 07-11-2004 12:11 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration