[SOLVED] Does current version of Slackware actually contain newest versions of software?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
No, you're right, I misread. This notwithstanding, showing one case doesn't set a rule. Quite the contrary actually, as you highlight that this software hadn't be updated for ages in Slackware
I'm not going to dig back into when Slackware packaged 24.3, but I've not highlighted this fact at all. emacs releases every couple of years. There was nothing to update to until the day before they updated to emacs 24.4.
My general impression is that Slackware keeps up pretty well except when it consciously decides not to. But I haven't been using it very long.
My general impression is that Slackware keeps up pretty well except when it consciously decides not to. But I haven't been using it very long.
My impression is that upgrades occur only when Patrick J. Volkerding thinks that the extra features or bug fixes are worth his time (testing and checking proper integration with other components included), or for security reasons.
And IIRC upgrades never occur in an already released Slackware just to get extra features.
I'm forgetting we're still talking about this rolling release nonsense. Yes, it's not a rolling release distro. It's the opposite. The opposite not being old packages but being a large slab of packages that get plonked down all at once without a lot of fussing on your part, kind of like a large city somehow being dropped from space with a great big boom followed by normal city activity. Yes, no wheels, nothing rolling. OP, did someone tell you Slackware was rolling release? Why that expectation?
When I say my impression is it keeps up pretty well I mean emacs, perl, and gcc each were modern enough not to bother me. Perl, IIRC (not at the machine now), was 5.18 in 14.1... very respectable for a year ago. I don't know about PHP, since I don't give a shit about that language. Likewise there's nothing happening in the Linux kernel I care about, so if that's old I wouldn't have noticed. And firefox is a necessary evil, besides which the not so long long term support version forced his hand so it's pretty new now.
So for the OP, if your definition of good distro is rolling release distro, which is kind of the impression I have somehow, then Slackware's not for you. OTH, you may want to find out what Slackware is and why the people who like it like it before moving on.
Last edited by thirdm; 12-05-2014 at 03:54 PM.
Reason: Lisp is ruining my English
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.