keefaz,
I think you're right. I was viewing several documents and may have been confused as to whether both tmpfs were needed. Interestingly, when I "df" after running for awhile, it does show about 1% usage on the tmpfs mounted on /tmp. Once when I viewed the contents of /tmp folder, I noticed an alsa file locked, so maybe that was the 1%.
Im going to remove the /tmp line and just leave the /dev/shm mounting point for tmpfs.
I hope someone has a definitive answer as to whether the /dev/shm and tmpfs is recommended for 2.6 kernel and udev or is it just a Gentoo recommendation and a leftover from the soon to be obsolete devfs.
Thanks,
Gary
|