SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Added ballot, checkmark, heavy ballot and heavy checkmark.
Changed HT, LF etc. in sizes 14 and 18-hi2 to be proportional to the letter height, not the matrix height.
Added the powerline characters E0A0..E0A2 and E0B0..E0B3.
Added diameter (2300) - same gluph as empty set (2205).
Small improvements in size 32.
Probably get no traction for this one, but I honestly think we could have a simpler Slacking experience without KDE. There are plenty of good smaller options to provide a default working desktop. It would make everyone's life easier. KDE is nice enough, but flies in the face of Slackware philosophy, just like Gnome does. Anyway, that's my two cents.
I'm yet to see KDE getting in my way, even when I opt not to install it at all.
And there are people that actually use it, so given that I see no need for it's removal.
Probably get no traction for this one, but I honestly think we could have a simpler Slacking experience without KDE. There are plenty of good smaller options to provide a default working desktop. It would make everyone's life easier. KDE is nice enough, but flies in the face of Slackware philosophy, just like Gnome does. Anyway, that's my two cents.
Slackware already includes a number of other WMs and desktops, so I'm not sure if I understand your reasoning.
Also, GNOME wasn't dropped because it "flies in the face of Slackware philosophy". It was dropped because it became too difficult for Pat to maintain builds of it.
Probably get no traction for this one, but I honestly think we could have a simpler Slacking experience without KDE. There are plenty of good smaller options to provide a default working desktop. It would make everyone's life easier. KDE is nice enough, but flies in the face of Slackware philosophy, just like Gnome does. Anyway, that's my two cents.
I'm OK with the current setup. I'd really love a "KDE apps for people that don't use KDE" metapackage, but the current situation is acceptable. My only request might be to kick the libraries really meant for KDE out of l/ and put them into kde/ instead. It would save me a 10-minute pktool session. A polite complaint E-mail to Pat would also take 10 minutes, so I end up with the pkgtool session and keep the complaint in my back pocket. Overall, no problem.
The KDE in -current is acceptably fast and solid on an old x86_64 Pentium 4 that I have at home, and I've been switched away from Xfce on that PC. Load time still sucks, though.
Probably get no traction for this one, but I honestly think we could have a simpler Slacking experience without KDE. There are plenty of good smaller options to provide a default working desktop. It would make everyone's life easier. KDE is nice enough, but flies in the face of Slackware philosophy, just like Gnome does. Anyway, that's my two cents.
I don't agree. Although I am a XFCE user I think that KDE adds a lot of excellent functionality to Slackware. I happily use k3b, kwrite, ksnapshot, etc. when I'm running XFCE. Removing KDE would be a mistake as it is an excellent DE.
Not sure this belongs here, I came across this "proposal to enable stateless persistant (sic) network interface names".
Just wondering: as the author states inconveniences of the so-called [mac] way (also used by Slackware, i.e. we do use the udev rule /lib/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules ), does these inconveniences actually occur for some of us? And will that change if we upgrade to a later version of udev extracted from systemd?
Just curious.
Last edited by Didier Spaier; 05-12-2015 at 01:33 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.