That'll teach me to not search / look at the stickies !
Consider this solved / answered.
As of 14.2 ( current ) aaa_elflibs are no longer blacklisted ...
Sorry about the waste of bandwidth.
-- kjh
All --
Been running slackware on my personal workstations for quite a while and I've gathered a few HOWTOs here and there along the way.
One doc in my collection is from 2005 ( Slackware 10.x ) -- aaa_elflibs.txt ( pasted below ).
It warns against upgrading aaa_elflibs.
Is that still true ?
Is it true if I've been running current and maintaining up-to-date packages ?
I am running multilib and ran massconvert32 and there is a new aaa_elflibs-compat32-14.2-x86_64-9compat32 ready to go.
What's my best action ?
Do I do nothing at all with aaa_elflibs ?
Should I upgradepkg both aaa_elflibs ( 64-bit and 32-bit )?
Or ... ???
Thanks !
-- kjh
Code:
##############################################################################
# Document: aaa_elflibs.txt
# Purpose : Explain why Slackware's aaa_elflibs should not be upgradepkg'd
# Author..: Stuart Winter <mozes@armedslack.org>
# Date....: 26-Jan-2005
#
# Based on the usenet thread I answered:
# http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.os.linux.slackware/browse_frm/thread/f2b53897d1614b93
# This was slightly before the release of Slackware-10.1
##############################################################################
Here is what Pat says about aaa_elflibs (slightly edited) some time ago.
I hope this helps explain the purpose of aaa_elflibs and answers the question
of why it should not be upgraded.
[..]
Of course, aaa_elflibs (kludgey as it is) contains a few nuggets that really aren't
found anywhere else. I've also been meaning to warn people that if they
see a new aaa_elflibs released that upgrading to it is a REALLY DUMB IDEA.
The aaa_ packages are intended for one time installation (though
reinstalling aaa_base is a lot safer than reinstalling aaa_elflibs).
aaa_elflibs is mostly to provide a net for people who would otherwise
install a functionally incomplete system to cut down on the amount
of help people need if they do not install required packages. It
wouldn't be such a bad package except that some projects (like, say CUPS,
or ALSA) don't tend to increment library versions when they release new ones,
so ancient ones in aaa_elflibs get copied over new ones, and things begin to
mysteriously fail. Fun, huh?
I've been meaning to look at a solution, but previous attempts like
staging libraries from /lib/incoming and considering if they should be
installed had other problems. A nice side effect of the filename
collisions is that having something listed in aaa_elflibs also prevents
removing the newer library when people run around removing things at
random so they can have 60GB free instead of 59GB ;-)
[..]
To answer the question about why aaa_elflibs is not mentioned in UPGRADE.TXT:
if you're upgrading every package in the OS, then there is no need
to worry about aaa_elflibs because its library *version* numbers are
identical to those contained within the main packages.
For example:
turrican [a] # tar ztvvf aaa_elflibs-10.1.0-i486-1.tgz | grep curses.so
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 253584 2005-01-24 17:02:29 lib/libncurses.so.5.4
turrican [a] # tar ztvvf ../l/ncurses-5.4-i486-2.tgz|grep curses.so
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 253600 2004-02-17 23:22:33 lib/libncurses.so.5.4
turrican [a] #
This is why it is not mentioned in the UPGRADE.TXT.
A short while ago, elflibs was renamed to aaa_elflibs (the name it now has) so
that it would always be installed prior to any other packages.
This was so that if you were installing Slackware-current then you wouldn't
run into the situation in the following example:
a/aaa_elflibs contains bzip2 libraries from a/bzip2
Because the packages are installed according to their alphabetic precedence,
it meant that bzip2 would be installed first. Remembering that aaa_elblibs
(or 'elflibs' as it was called previously) was only updated right before
a new release of Slackware, you run into the problem, or run the risk that
the installation goes like this:
- a/bzip2 is installed -- this is the very latest bzip2
- <more packages installed>
- elflibs package is installed
This package has not been updated since the last release of Slackware
it contains ancient libraries -- including an old copy of bzip2's .so.
It was renamed 'aaa_elflibs' to work around this problem.
This also explains why you should not upgradepkg aaa_elflibs *without*
also upgrading the entire OS.
The short version: one who is running Slackware-current should upgrade
everything *but* aaa_elflibs because aaa_elflibs will (up until a few days ago)
have contained libraries from when Slackware 10 was first released.