LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-06-2022, 12:38 PM   #1
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,292

Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
Current ISO August 2nd not booting


I tried a clean disk install with slackware64-current-20220802 from a usb key. Not good results.
  1. When I tried a usb boot on the slackware64-current iso (UEFI or legacy) I got the standard lilo snafu - the 'L' followed by rows of '99 99…' I tried CSM - same result. In fact nothing would boot
  2. I made a 2nd usb with the slackware64-15.0-install.iso. That booted fine, I started an install, and when it asked for a disk with the slackware packages, I pulled out the 15.0 install & inserted the slackware64-current iso. Installed fine, set up elilo, but elilo wouldn't boot.
When I tried to boot with elilo, I got three initial lines only, then the screen went black, then the bios boot repeated. When I booted slackware64-15.0, I get the three lines, but on the fourth is a '—' while kernel & initrd load, then the kernel messages start.

I spent a while double checking, but this is repeatable. So I reinstalled slackware64-15.0, and am posting from it now.

If I made an obvious goof, keep me humble(!). If there's a quick fix or workaround, let me know.
 
Old 08-06-2022, 01:12 PM   #2
garpu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,536

Rep: Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899
Does the Aug. 2 iso use 5.19? There's a problem with the efi stub in it, and people were having problems booting from it directly. Might want to try one with 5.18.16, instead.
 
Old 08-06-2022, 01:38 PM   #3
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,292

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
Quote:
Originally Posted by garpu View Post
Does the Aug. 2 iso use 5.19? There's a problem with the efi stub in it, and people were having problems booting from it directly. Might want to try one with 5.18.16, instead.
When I saw a fast reply, I thought I was being kept humble
Yes August 2 does use 5.19.0. That's a probable cause for fault 2. Thanks for that. It's always inadvisable to get any kernel with '0' as the last number

So I can feel ok about myself. I'm going to come up for air before doing any more installs. It seemed I was trying to install where the Bermuda Triangle intersected with the Twilight zone. Murphy's law had a field day.

That might explain both faults in my post. What it doesn't explain is why I saw the classic lilo snafu and only one partition, unless you're not supposed to install from Current?
 
Old 08-06-2022, 01:40 PM   #4
garpu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,536

Rep: Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
That might explain both faults in my post. What it doesn't explain is why I saw the classic lilo snafu and only one partition, unless you're not supposed to install from Current?
Legacy *should* work, though. My desktop (UEFI) had problems with 5.19 before the elilo patch. My laptop (LILO, legacy BIOS mode) had no problems. Both are on current.
 
Old 08-06-2022, 01:52 PM   #5
LuckyCyborg
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,500

Rep: Reputation: 3308Reputation: 3308Reputation: 3308Reputation: 3308Reputation: 3308Reputation: 3308Reputation: 3308Reputation: 3308Reputation: 3308Reputation: 3308Reputation: 3308
Quote:
Originally Posted by garpu View Post
Legacy *should* work, though. My desktop (UEFI) had problems with 5.19 before the elilo patch. My laptop (LILO, legacy BIOS mode) had no problems. Both are on current.
However, from my experience the LILO has its own share of issues on CSM mode of modern UEFI motherboards.

Let's say that OP had a really bad inspiration on trying to install exactly that particular day ISO. Murphy's law at work, as himself said.

Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 08-06-2022 at 02:00 PM.
 
Old 08-06-2022, 02:27 PM   #6
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,292

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
A thing I didn't make clear is that there only seemed to be one partition in the August 2nd iso, whereas slackware64-15.0 had two. As an example of my weekend, I tried to loop mount the current iso to take a look. It is puking with the error "Unknown filesystem 'iso9660' although I tried it with & without the '-t' option. The laptop mounted it, of course. Same kernel & modules on both .

The usb keys: Slackware-15.0 has 2 partitions under fdisk, but ~current has only one.
 
Old 08-07-2022, 04:51 AM   #7
Windu
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Distribution: Arch Linux, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 589

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
A thing I didn't make clear is that there only seemed to be one partition in the August 2nd iso, whereas slackware64-15.0 had two. As an example of my weekend, I tried to loop mount the current iso to take a look. It is puking with the error "Unknown filesystem 'iso9660' although I tried it with & without the '-t' option. The laptop mounted it, of course. Same kernel & modules on both .

The usb keys: Slackware-15.0 has 2 partitions under fdisk, but ~current has only one.
Where are you getting your ISO? Slackware does not offer an ISO for -current so perhaps you made one yourself?
I downloaded one from https://us.slackware.nl/slackware/sl...4-current-iso/ and that ISO has two partitions:

Code:
# fdisk -u -l slackware64-current-install-dvd.iso 
Disk slackware64-current-install-dvd.iso: 3.42 GiB, 3667918848 bytes, 7163904 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x43b1add3

Device                               Boot  Start   End     Sectors  Size Id Type
slackware64-current-install-dvd.iso1 *        0    7163903 7163904  3.4G  0 Empt
slackware64-current-install-dvd.iso2       3028       5907    2880  1.4M ef EFI
 
Old 08-07-2022, 06:31 AM   #8
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,292

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
ftp://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/ftp.slackwar...2_Aug_2022.iso
Or, in text with spaces so it won't fold:
ftp.heanet.ie/pub/ftp.slackware.com /pub/slackware/slackware-iso /slackware64-current-iso/ slackware64-current-02_Aug_2022.iso
 
Old 08-07-2022, 09:46 AM   #9
Windu
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Distribution: Arch Linux, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 589

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
ftp://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/ftp.slackwar...2_Aug_2022.iso
Or, in text with spaces so it won't fold:
ftp.heanet.ie/pub/ftp.slackware.com /pub/slackware/slackware-iso /slackware64-current-iso/ slackware64-current-02_Aug_2022.iso
Apparently the script to generate that ISO is here: http://www.slackware.no/makeSlackISOs.sh
I looked at the script, it has a 2015 timestamp and it does not add UEFI support. Nor does it make a hybrid ISO, so copying it to a USB stick using 'dd' or 'cp' will result in an unbootable USB stick.
 
Old 08-07-2022, 01:12 PM   #10
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,292

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
Ha! Thanks for that. That was me being dutiful and staying on my local mirror…

But I don't need another iso. I mirrored the directories, I have my clean install of 15.0, I have the (slightly modified) directories, so I can just do the 'upgradepkg' trick on that, clean up the/boot/efi stuff to reflect the new reality, and then reboot.

I will probably do that - but not yet . I want to come up for air first. What I'd like to know is how did you track heanet's iso-making script?
 
Old 08-07-2022, 02:45 PM   #11
Windu
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Distribution: Arch Linux, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 589

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
What I'd like to know is how did you track heanet's iso-making script?
Not so hard to find out. It's mentioned in the README.TXT in the same directory as where you downloaded the ISO: https://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/ftp.slackw...iso/README.TXT .

Note that your URL is incorrect if you want to use https instead of the deprecated ftp protocol, there is only a 'slackware-current-iso' directory, no 'slackware64-current-iso' directory.
 
Old 08-08-2022, 03:43 AM   #12
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,292

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
Thanks. I remember my way around in heanet, and just run 'ls' near the end because names can change there. They used to have a directory 'mirrors/' beside pub/, so I would use 'mirrors/slackware' instead of 'pub/ftp.slackware.com'. But that vanished one day. They also had a directory split in the current isos, IIRC, but that's gone too. Speed has improved, however. They must have a bigger pipe, or everyone got fed up with them and cleared off.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] slackware-current-iso/slackware-current-install-dvd.iso , Anyone else mirror a copy ? babydr Slackware 7 07-19-2021 11:13 AM
[SOLVED] Slackware 64 Current: Network Manager and lid open: works in January Slackware, not August Slackware jr_bob_dobbs Slackware 7 01-28-2021 09:02 AM
Problems starting XFCE and MATE after the latest current (August 2015) stormtracknole Slackware 4 08-12-2015 11:45 PM
LXer: DebConf8 to be held from August 2nd to August 17th 2008 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-15-2007 11:01 PM
Does anyone Know how to open either .iso.rz or these .iso.xdelta,.iso.bz2,.iso.lzma?? maximalred Debian 5 06-09-2004 06:15 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration