[SOLVED] consumed space bigger than total disc space?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hello!
Today try look to one server, who work as backuppc under Debian, and see very strange for me, thing, who i cannot understand.
there is 5.4 Tb partition on /
and i see in/var/lib/backuppc/compname some folder, where do "ctrl+space" in midnight commander show about 1042 - 1057 Gb in some folders - summary there shows more use space, than is in that disc itself.
how can it be possible?
FS is ext3
go inside one of that folder - "select all" - the same summary size, about a
1,076,752M bytes in 15713 files
how it is possible? there is several folders like that, with summary size about 25880G ( ~25 Tb? )?
oh yes - on df -h and so all is correct - consumed space is less than total, but if look at that folders, and count wasted space....
Backuppc (and rsnapshot) uses hard links to provide multiple snapshot-style full backups. The space required is the sum of one full backup plus all the differentials since that full. But hard links create the illusion that each of the subsequent snapshots occupies at least the same amount of space as the first.
Backuppc (and rsnapshot) uses hard links to provide multiple snapshot-style full backups. The space required is the sum of one full backup plus all the differentials since that full. But hard links create the illusion that each of the subsequent snapshots occupies at least the same amount of space as the first.
ok, thanks for info. i be hear abou dduplication in backuppc, but i thinking, it is backuppc internal mechanism, who provides it, not on filesystem level.
thanks for enlightening, also a thanks to Labinnah for help
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.