SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Today I installed Afterstep 2.2 on my workplace box. It totally rocks. The compile went totally smoothly (I downloaded the source from afterstep.org) and it's working wonderfully. The menus are fuller than anything in Enlightenment -- I have applications that I didn't know I had.
Of course, I had to learn how to use "killall" after I activated xsnow and found no way to turn it off.
If you want to try an alternative window manager, give it a try.
Glad you found a window manager that you like. There's quite a bunch
to pick from, that's for sure. Whatever servers your hardware or personal taste.
I remember, more than 10 years ago, when I was still an uneducated Windows-slave, my first and only impressions of Linux came from computer magazines I read. And the screenshots showed some kind of GUI that looked pretty nice with all that gradients and big high-colour icons and I thought like "Gaah, colours! Me wantee!". And yes, that was the Afterstep wm.
When I tried Linux some time later, however, I settled with fvwm2.
Nowadays, with all that RAM and cpu cycles to spare, I use a heavily customized KDE3.5 and am very satisfied with its functionality.
Glad you found a window manager that you like. There's quite a bunch
to pick from, that's for sure. Whatever servers your hardware or personal taste.
I remember, more than 10 years ago, when I was still an uneducated Windows-slave, my first and only impressions of Linux came from computer magazines I read. And the screenshots showed some kind of GUI that looked pretty nice with all that gradients and big high-colour icons and I thought like "Gaah, colours! Me wantee!". And yes, that was the Afterstep wm.
When I tried Linux some time later, however, I settled with fvwm2 and its ridiculous configurability.
Nowadays, with all that RAM and cpu cycles to spare, I use a heavily customized KDE3.5 and am very satisfied with its functionality.
cheers
fabian
PS: I always thought it is a good idea to bind the command xkill to a keyboard shortcut
I prefer fluxbox ... just cuz it's very light, very customizable, and very functional. Only possible downside is not a lot of auto-detection of programs, but I don't really care, I just write the menu myself, I only have to do it once.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.