LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-03-2016, 06:08 AM   #16
san2ban
Member
 
Registered: May 2013
Location: Bengaluru / India
Distribution: Slackware14.2-64bit on one HDD, Slackware64-current on anotherHDD, VoidLinux on Libreboot laptop
Posts: 169

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled

grep........: blank
ls -la : NetworkManager-0.9.8.8-x86_64-1
 
Old 07-03-2016, 06:23 AM   #17
rkfb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Guildford, England
Distribution: Slackware64 -current running i3
Posts: 494

Rep: Reputation: 174Reputation: 174
As a quick fix you could install wicd from extra/

Reboot and issue 'wicd-curses' from the console to connect.

(Another recommendation made by Slackware is a full install. It's probably best if you do this in future even if you don't want KDE. It makes it a lot easier in situations like this).
 
Old 07-03-2016, 06:28 AM   #18
san2ban
Member
 
Registered: May 2013
Location: Bengaluru / India
Distribution: Slackware14.2-64bit on one HDD, Slackware64-current on anotherHDD, VoidLinux on Libreboot laptop
Posts: 169

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
No way of connecting to internet from command line? With NetworkManager 0.9.8?
 
Old 07-03-2016, 06:52 AM   #19
rkfb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Guildford, England
Distribution: Slackware64 -current running i3
Posts: 494

Rep: Reputation: 174Reputation: 174
Have a look at nmcli and it's options, it'll be something like

nmcli connection add type 802-11-wireless (or whatever) ssid .... etc

but wicd might be easier for now. It's up to you.
 
Old 07-03-2016, 07:10 AM   #20
Gerard Lally
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Leinster, IE
Distribution: Slackware, NetBSD
Posts: 2,184

Rep: Reputation: 1765Reputation: 1765Reputation: 1765Reputation: 1765Reputation: 1765Reputation: 1765Reputation: 1765Reputation: 1765Reputation: 1765Reputation: 1765Reputation: 1765
Quote:
Originally Posted by san2ban View Post
Mine is a wireless 3G internet connection.
Hi san2ban,

for the sake of clarity, can you tell us whether you have a 3G mifi router to which you connect wirelessly (802.11), or a 3G modem you plug into a USB port, which is a different type of wireless connection (wireless WAN)? I don't think wicd supports this kind of connection, but nmtui might do.

Last edited by Gerard Lally; 07-03-2016 at 07:14 AM.
 
Old 07-03-2016, 07:33 AM   #21
san2ban
Member
 
Registered: May 2013
Location: Bengaluru / India
Distribution: Slackware14.2-64bit on one HDD, Slackware64-current on anotherHDD, VoidLinux on Libreboot laptop
Posts: 169

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
3G mobile hotspor,
 
Old 07-03-2016, 07:35 AM   #22
san2ban
Member
 
Registered: May 2013
Location: Bengaluru / India
Distribution: Slackware14.2-64bit on one HDD, Slackware64-current on anotherHDD, VoidLinux on Libreboot laptop
Posts: 169

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
3G Mobile hotspots
 
Old 07-03-2016, 07:40 AM   #23
san2ban
Member
 
Registered: May 2013
Location: Bengaluru / India
Distribution: Slackware14.2-64bit on one HDD, Slackware64-current on anotherHDD, VoidLinux on Libreboot laptop
Posts: 169

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
3G mobile USB tethering, MTS mblaze ultra 3G
 
Old 07-03-2016, 08:10 AM   #24
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Quote:
Originally Posted by san2ban View Post
3G mobile USB tethering, MTS mblaze ultra 3G
I suggest you to to dump that crap and buy a real modem. You do not see that it give you transfer errors?

IF I will have to use that shit, err... "blaze ultra-crap", I would choose the downloading of the full ISO via torrent, for the sake of the pieces checksum, check the torrent four times, then I would follow very careful that UPGRADE.TXT.

From when slackpkg-ing without kernel upgrade is recommended method of upgrading on Slackware? I laugh my ass!

Last edited by Darth Vader; 07-03-2016 at 08:34 AM.
 
Old 07-03-2016, 08:17 AM   #25
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,110

Rep: Reputation: 4180Reputation: 4180Reputation: 4180Reputation: 4180Reputation: 4180Reputation: 4180Reputation: 4180Reputation: 4180Reputation: 4180Reputation: 4180Reputation: 4180
San2ban, your install seems borked: NetworkManager seems to be at the old version.
IMHO, the only way to solve is to download a slackware64-14.2 iso and reinstall all the packages.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-03-2016, 12:08 PM   #26
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader View Post
I would choose the downloading of the full ISO via torrent, for the sake of the pieces checksum, check the torrent four times
What is the point of checking it four times? The checksum won't randomly change after it's done downloading...

This is like all the people telling Android owners to do a full wipe 3x. There's no point. One wipe is enough, just as one checking of the torrent is enough.
 
Old 07-03-2016, 12:35 PM   #27
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
What is the point of checking it four times? The checksum won't randomly change after it's done downloading...
In this case, is just a safety measure that we do not have also a ultra-crap hard disk (unstable sectors).

IF the ISO was successfully read four times, you can bet that it will give you some fine data on the number five attempt.

Last edited by Darth Vader; 07-03-2016 at 12:37 PM.
 
Old 07-03-2016, 12:36 PM   #28
zk1234
4MLinux Maintainer
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Poland
Distribution: 4MLinux, Slackware
Posts: 1,255

Rep: Reputation: 220Reputation: 220Reputation: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
just as one checking of the torrent is enough.
That's true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
This is like all the people telling Android owners to do a full wipe 3x. There's no point. One wipe is enough.
That's not true. The best wiping techniques use multiplied passes.
 
Old 07-03-2016, 03:26 PM   #29
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader View Post
In this case, is just a safety measure that we do not have also a ultra-crap hard disk (unstable sectors).

IF the ISO was successfully read four times, you can bet that it will give you some fine data on the number five attempt.
This is still overkill. If there aren't any checksum errors when the file is downloaded, and it passes a second check (which many clients complete when the torrent is finished), it isn't likely anything else would happen... at least not on a semi-stable system. If your system is already running into a ton of problems that may be harddrive related, then checking a torrent should be the least of your concerns and you should work on getting replacement hardware.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zk1234 View Post
That's not true. The best wiping techniques use multiplied passes.
This is completely false... for Android. We aren't talking about securely removing files to prevent disk recovery software from finding them, we're talking about removing files so the filesystem can't see them anymore. One pass will do, and no more are needed. If you format a filesystem in Linux (or run rm file) then you can't access that data using normal tools. For all intents and purposes, that data is gone.

This fallacy has been floating around longer than using a taskmanager to kill all running applications in Android to help save your battery.
 
Old 07-03-2016, 03:42 PM   #30
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
ok what i found on all my upgrades from 14.1 to current to slackware 14.2 for the last 5 months is.

For some reason networkmanager using it used eth1 instead of eth0 I only have one device. I have no clue why but when I go to the "/etc/rc./rc.intet1.conf" and add yes to the eth1 and reboot networkmanager is happy. it is only this way on an upgrade ok. from a new install that is not an issue.

I have no clue why because I stop caring I brought this up I think last year or the very begening of this year. I noticed the same thing happen again on my latest stable upgrade last night.
as for the udev problem that was solved many moons ago slackpkg install-new would have fixed that. and after your done. with the upgrade clean the system and
start fresh time. Why because this is the most incredible virgin Pat has put out and she needs to start clean only my point of view.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] error while loading shared libraries: libacl.so.1: cannot open shared object file: fl0 Slackware 4 03-22-2013 03:32 AM
error while loading shared libraries: libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file: xmixail Linux - Kernel 15 07-29-2012 08:39 PM
error while loading shared libraries: libtermcap.so.2: cannot open shared object file astroboy2000ir Linux - Software 3 12-07-2010 11:16 PM
error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file: Franziss Linux - Newbie 10 06-28-2010 05:47 AM
error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file PaulyWally Debian 2 10-18-2008 05:59 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration