A great difference between Arch Linux and Slackware distributions?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Seriously speaking, I followed the ARCH development since its inception, when it was just an obscure idea of "Slackware with deps and more efficient build system".
I'd still love to find some link where this is documented. The stuff on the Arch wiki, old historical pieces on the forums and all quotes I can find from Judd Vinet mention only Crux as an inspiration and that Arch was built from scratch. No mention of Slackware at all.
Are you sure you aren't talking about Frugalware, which was based on Slackware initially but used pacman from Arch as its package manager?
BTW, would be really nice if Slackware would adopt the ARCH's BUILDPKG. It is a script made in bash, and its usage results in much less verbose build scripts.
OK, probably it should be adapted to generate Slackware packages and... to strip the deps support.
But about Arch, you could give a go to its derivative Manjaro, which is very easy to install and use.
I once used manjaro after a less than informed suggestion from a friend on my laptop. After about a week or two I got frustrated in that its plastic wrap interfered with several arch features and to see if I could I debranded it from manjaro into a working arch system including changing to the arch mirror. Besides being surprised it actually worked I also noticed my system was at least twice as responsive as it was with manjaro's plastic wrapping installed.
I grew to dislike arch because keeping up with all the package updates as well as fixing everything arch PKGBUILD maintainers have done wrong turned out to be a full time job, but its still much better than manjaro.
I'd of course suggest another OS like alpine (Or Slackware) instead which has some similarities as to arch or debian, but they seem to have a much more sane approach.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.