LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-26-2004, 08:59 PM   #1
tw001_tw
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Distribution: kubuntu-current
Posts: 551
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 31
a bit off topic - but my frustration is coming through


I switched from suse 9.0 to slackware 9.1. I would have just waited a few more weeks and got suse 9.1, but I wanted something faster.

And yes, slackware is faster...MUCH faster - that I love about it. But EVERY step, every new piece of hardware (since not much was setup from the initial install) takes SO much time.


I spent collectively 4 hours or so to get my scroll moue working and my dual head card working yesterday. I have been working for about 1 1/2 hours to get my Xerox laser printer to print. works fine some places, but not others.

I'm terrified of setting up my video capture card.

My creative SB Live pci card isn't detected or working.

I havn't even thought about burning a cd.

At this rate it will take me a week or more just to install the OS and configure my hardware, much less my applications.


----------------------------------

Seriously, is it really this hard for those of us who are not proficient at linux? Or am I missing something painfully easy? I am not one to be affraid of command lines (DOS 5 was my first OS) - nor am I affraid to read and learn - that is 1/2 of why I am doing this..... but I do have to make it usable for the rest of the family, not just me.

what am i missing ???
 
Old 05-26-2004, 09:01 PM   #2
tw001_tw
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Distribution: kubuntu-current
Posts: 551

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 31
I do want to add - All the help I have gotten here in the slackware group is GREATLY appreciated.. You guys are great.. no doubt about that..
 
Old 05-26-2004, 09:02 PM   #3
Linux.tar.gz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Paris
Distribution: Slackware forever.
Posts: 2,534

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
Now you know how to proceed.
 
Old 05-27-2004, 01:52 AM   #4
BorisMcHack
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: uk
Distribution: debian sarge
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15
It does get easier, honest !!

For your SB Live get the latest alsa source and when you get to the configure stage use:

./configure --with-cards=emu10k1

and perhaps --with-sequencer=yes but I'm not absolutely sure if it's supported on the SB Live! (For instance doomII (legacy) will not play music, but you can always play your mp3 collection instead.) You may also need to tell configure where the kernel source is....

There's several src packages for alsa, I only bother with alsa-driver, alsa-lib, and alsa-utils. Compile in that order. the utils gives you alsactl with which you can store and restore your mixer settings, and alsamixer with which to set the settings - just adjust the obvious channels ie master, pcm, cd, etc. I'll not repeat a certain message about mixer levels

--

I've noticed that mpg123 (or 321) on the console plays back everything crackly, ogg123 is fine, and xmms is fine.

Last edited by BorisMcHack; 05-27-2004 at 01:54 AM.
 
Old 05-27-2004, 02:25 AM   #5
rylan76
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Potchefstroom, South Africa
Distribution: Fedora 17 - 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64
Posts: 1,552

Rep: Reputation: 103Reputation: 103
Just a comment... I've been surfing only a few weeks here, and I use RedHat - it REALLY seems that especially you Slackware guys have heaps and heaps of problems that simply never happen in RedHat - take the SBLive issue for example. My Rh9 detected it right out of the box, and it worked first time - same for my CDRW - (Sony CRX175E2) and my graphics card (Nvidia GEForce 4 MX440 based).

Have you tried a RedHat distro? I don't know if it will be as fast as Slackware, but it might be easier to get set up...
 
Old 05-27-2004, 04:30 AM   #6
jenso
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Stockholm
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Re: a bit off topic - but my frustration is coming through

Quote:
Originally posted by tw001_tw

My creative SB Live pci card isn't detected or working.

Check /etc/rc.d/rc.modules
Code:
### OSS Sound support ###
### (Old Sound System ;-)
# Sound Blaster Pro/16 support:
#/sbin/modprobe sb io=0x220 irq=5 dma=3 dma16=5 mpu_io=0x300
# Sound Blaster Live support:
#/sbin/modprobe emu10k1 <---Uncomment that line
modprobe emu10k1

I havn't even thought about burning a cd.
cat /proc/sys/dev/cdrom/info or cdrecord -scanbus.
Add to lilo:
append="hdX=ide-scsi"
modprobe ide-scsi.
/sbin/lilo -v and reboot.

At this rate it will take me a week or more just to install the OS and configure my hardware, much less my applications
May bee

----------------------------------

Seriously, is it really this hard for those of us who are not proficient at linux? Or am I missing something painfully easy? I am not one to be affraid of command lines (DOS 5 was my first OS) - nor am I affraid to read and learn - that is 1/2 of why I am doing this..... but I do have to make it usable for the rest of the family, not just me.

what am i missing ???
The odd thing or to.

/Jens
 
Old 05-27-2004, 04:59 AM   #7
BinaryLinux
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 9.1 and 10
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 15
Re: a bit off topic - but my frustration is coming through

Quote:
----------------------------------

Seriously, is it really this hard for those of us who are not proficient at linux? Or am I missing something painfully easy? I am not one to be affraid of command lines (DOS 5 was my first OS) - nor am I affraid to read and learn - that is 1/2 of why I am doing this..... but I do have to make it usable for the rest of the family, not just me.

what am i missing ???
Slackware is harder to use than the other distros available but the more you use it you will find that it becomes easier to use. The thing about Slackware is that it makes you learn how to use Linux and that it shows you the workings of a Linux system.


Quote:
I've noticed that mpg123 (or 321) on the console plays back everything crackly, ogg123 is fine, and xmms is fine.
I use amp to play my mp3s when using the console and it works fine for me.
 
Old 05-27-2004, 08:14 AM   #8
trey85stang
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,091

Rep: Reputation: 41
Re: a bit off topic - but my frustration is coming through

Quote:
Originally posted by tw001_tw
I switched from suse 9.0 to slackware 9.1. I would have just waited a few more weeks and got suse 9.1, but I wanted something faster.

And yes, slackware is faster...MUCH faster - that I love about it. But EVERY step, every new piece of hardware (since not much was setup from the initial install) takes SO much time.


I spent collectively 4 hours or so to get my scroll moue working and my dual head card working yesterday. I have been working for about 1 1/2 hours to get my Xerox laser printer to print. works fine some places, but not others.

I'm terrified of setting up my video capture card.

My creative SB Live pci card isn't detected or working.

I havn't even thought about burning a cd.

At this rate it will take me a week or more just to install the OS and configure my hardware, much less my applications.


----------------------------------

Seriously, is it really this hard for those of us who are not proficient at linux? Or am I missing something painfully easy? I am not one to be affraid of command lines (DOS 5 was my first OS) - nor am I affraid to read and learn - that is 1/2 of why I am doing this..... but I do have to make it usable for the rest of the family, not just me.

what am i missing ???
Thats the great thing about slackware.. its ahrd the first time. but its easy the next 15,000 times you have to do it. Besides, I have heard a saying that if you use suse, redhat or mandrake... you are learning how to use suse, redhat or mandrake. If you use slackware you learn how to use linux which applies in most form and fashion on all distros
 
Old 05-27-2004, 08:26 AM   #9
tw001_tw
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Distribution: kubuntu-current
Posts: 551

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 31
All of you made some really good points...

And thanks for the tips on getting things working. Since I installed Slackware on an extra drive, I can always plug back in my suse drive and work.... until I get slack figured out through time. I am making notes and backups of files ... so I guess the next time won't be nearly as hard as trey85stang mentioned.

In reference to running redhat, i had the same thing with suse - automatic detection and configuration of devices... although it is super easy and time saving.... I am learning a hell of alot more about linux with my slackware install.

Well, I'll keep plugging away at slackware - once I get everything working it'll be grreat, but until then, suse it is.

I will reference this thread for the tips that were givin.... be back when I get stuck...

thanks a lot folks.. best regards - tw
 
Old 05-27-2004, 09:21 AM   #10
ringwraith
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 1,272

Rep: Reputation: 65
Quote:
Originally posted by rylan76
Just a comment... I've been surfing only a few weeks here, and I use RedHat - it REALLY seems that especially you Slackware guys have heaps and heaps of problems that simply never happen in RedHat - take the SBLive issue for example. My Rh9 detected it right out of the box, and it worked first time - same for my CDRW - (Sony CRX175E2) and my graphics card (Nvidia GEForce 4 MX440 based).

Have you tried a RedHat distro? I don't know if it will be as fast as Slackware, but it might be easier to get set up...
Did you read the original post (oops, forgot. That's why people use RH based distros, to avoid doing that ;-) j/k (maybe)) ? The writer said that he just changed from SuSe to Slackware. So he is coming from an rpm based distro that automagically sets everything up for him. But he apparently wants to control his box rather than leaving it all up to the distro.
Also, all of these problems are why experienced Slackware people usually know a great deal more about Linux than the average user of other distros. Slackware makes you learn what modules are, how modprobe works or depmod. It makes you learn how to edit init scripts by hand and a host of other things. We don't want guis to set things up, we don't want unseen processes changing setting and conf files. If we did we would still be using winblows.
I agree with you in a way. Slackware is not for everyone. If you don't want to spend time setting up your box. Go RH or SuSe or Mandrake. Setting up a Slack box that has some difficult hardware can be a tough time consuming process with lots of frustration.

Last edited by ringwraith; 05-27-2004 at 09:24 AM.
 
Old 05-27-2004, 09:49 AM   #11
keefaz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 6,552

Rep: Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872
Redhat is hell for maintenance work, it is a hell for init script, its patched gcc is a hell...For gamers or web surfers maybe redhat is good choice but definitivly not for serious work
 
Old 05-27-2004, 09:55 AM   #12
BorisMcHack
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: uk
Distribution: debian sarge
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15
When I moved to linux from win98 I first tried RH7.2. I didn't like it cos it was sluggish and and as a complete linux newbie was struggling to find the information to get my hardware working. I gave up on linux for a month and then tried debian which I used up till the start of this month. I had to learn to use Debian otherwise I may aswell stuck with Windows and its secrative ways and continue not getting anything out of it.

Slackware has in common with Debian this process of learning to solve problems and gives the user a sense of satisfaction and achievment. When I tried Mandrake 10, everything was setup nice and it even got my Lexmark Z11 printer working which I'd been trying to do for ages. But it just was too easy ! No satisfaction, so off it went.

Right now I'm struggling to patch my bl***y kernel to give file monitoring (imon or dnotify) but I'm no expert on patching.....so I can continue compiling gnome2.6 sigh.....(patch seems to be doing nothing ie 0% cpu and just sits there idle until I ctrl-c it) (oops forgot the '<' character)

Last edited by BorisMcHack; 05-27-2004 at 10:14 AM.
 
Old 05-27-2004, 10:17 AM   #13
Kovacs
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE
Posts: 607

Rep: Reputation: 32
The benefit of those initial hurdles is that at the end of the day you have a kick ass fast and stable system that is a breeze to maintain and upgrade - and you know a lot more about linux than when you started.
 
Old 05-27-2004, 11:30 AM   #14
Nis
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: Ubuntu Hoary (5.04)
Posts: 550

Rep: Reputation: 31
If you did a full install of Slackware 9.1, ALSA packages should be installed. As root,
Code:
alsaconf
and hope your card is detected.

If you're still using a 2.4.x kernel (default in Slackware) then you'll need to add this to your /etc/lilo.conf (if you're NOT using a SCSI burner) if you want CD burning
Code:
append = "hdx=ide-scsi"
where hdx is you burner (hdb, hdc, etc).
Now you'll need to redo the CD burner symlink. As root
Code:
cd /dev
rm cdrom (or whatever your burner is called)
ln -s /dev/scd0 cdrom
Now search LQ for how to use cdrecord.

For the video-capture card somebody else will have to speak up; I don't have one
 
Old 05-27-2004, 01:09 PM   #15
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 87
This is not an original quote, but: "If you want to learn how to use Redhat, install Redhat. If you want to learn how to use Linux, install Slack." Totally true, no ands, ifs, or buts. -- J.W.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which version of 32 bit redhat will install on IBM xSeries 366 (64 bit)? Hello123 Linux - Hardware 2 09-14-2005 05:50 AM
A bit off-topic but what is Unix exactly and how does it work? Mr. Hill Linux - Newbie 19 03-01-2005 12:40 AM
C, read 8 bit octal numbers, convert to 24 bit binary bamalabs Programming 3 01-20-2004 09:59 AM
need help urgently!!! display not coming and error mesage coming when user is logging rddreamz Linux - Newbie 0 08-14-2003 11:11 AM
Graphic Card that Supports displaying 8-bit and 24-bit images simultaneously yrraja Linux - Hardware 2 04-30-2003 06:41 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration