LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-24-2013, 06:56 AM   #1
Sefid par
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2013
Location: Iran, Shiraz
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: 26
Question [kernel-headers-3.2.45-x86-3] OR [kernel-headers-3.2.45_smp-x86-3]?


When I tried to upgrade My Slackware, I got the following error:
Which one of "kernel-headers" should I keep?
What is the best action for me?
Code:
#slackpkg upgrade-all

Checking local integrity... DONE
You have a broken /var/log/packages - with two versions of the same package.
The list of packages duplicated in your machine are shown below, but don't
worry about this list - when you select your action, slackpkg will show a
better list:

kernel-headers-3.2.45-x86-3
kernel-headers-3.2.45_smp-x86-3

You can (B)lacklist, (R)emove, or (I)gnore these packages.
Select your action (B/R/I):
 
Old 07-24-2013, 07:30 AM   #2
Stuferus
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2013
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 168

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
depends on the kernel you use. if you use the nonsmp, keep the nonsmp if you use an smp on, keep the smp headers. logic.. that simple
 
Old 07-24-2013, 09:43 AM   #3
jtsn
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Posts: 922

Rep: Reputation: 478Reputation: 478Reputation: 478Reputation: 478Reputation: 478
You don't need to upgrade kernel-headers at all. Actually it is safer to keep kernel-headers 3.2.29 around, upgrading them may break glibc.
 
Old 07-24-2013, 09:59 AM   #4
digger95
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Indiana, PA
Distribution: Slackware 14
Posts: 330

Rep: Reputation: 46
As far as I know there is no problem keeping both...

You probably got the latest stable kernel version (3.2.45) during your last slackpkg upgrade and now you have kernel headers for both smp and non-smp. Slackpkg erroneously thinks that they are duplicate packages hence the message.

You just need to edit /etc/slackpkg/blacklist and uncomment all of the kernel lines as recommended and then you won't be asked about it again.

Last edited by digger95; 07-24-2013 at 03:52 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply

Tags
kernel, slackpkg, update


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] After upgrading to kernel 3.8 module-assistant can't find kernel headers (Debian Sid) Hungry ghost Debian 9 05-16-2013 07:59 PM
Trying to install ethernet adapter driver, not finding kernel-devel or kernel-headers oneFishtwoFish Red Hat 5 08-31-2010 06:24 PM
Zypper wants to dl the wrong kernel headers... YaST doesnt have current headers zorb SUSE / openSUSE 2 11-28-2009 11:12 AM
Automatic removal of kernel headers package when kernel packages are removed bgoodr Debian 3 12-30-2008 08:14 PM
Errors Compiling Kernel 2.6 on Slackware 10.2 - Old kernel headers required? Dave S. Slackware 8 03-04-2006 12:15 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration