PuppyThis forum is for the discussion of Puppy Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Should work ok.
Have 233Mhz Dell with 96MB using puppy 2.10r1, works very well.
If puppy runs from CD then create a linux swap partition on the HD.
There is a bug with 2.11 HD install, so use 2.10r1 at the moment.
I guess I could also install Puppy on the HD (which is only 1.5GB).
Cheers,
Tim
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric21
Should work ok.
Have 233Mhz Dell with 96MB using puppy 2.10r1, works very well.
If puppy runs from CD then create a linux swap partition on the HD.
There is a bug with 2.11 HD install, so use 2.10r1 at the moment.
Last month, someone gave me a pentium 166MHz portable with 16MB of RAM. I came *this* close to getting it to boot Puppy (it thrashes forever at the stage of loading the desktop). I reckon it would have worked with 32MB, or even 24. And I regularly run Puppy 2.02 installed on my 133MHz P1 with 80MB and it runs pretty well. Not exactly fast, but usable. Of course, dillo and ted run a little more smoothly than Seamonkey and Abiword!
A little update to my previous post. One of the other contributors from the main Puppy Forum made me a gift of some old laptop EDO RAM, which I put into the machine I mentioned above. So the present system config is:
166MHz Pentium 1
40MB RAM
1.6GB hard disk with 128MB Linux swap partition
Puppy 2.02 (the nearest CD I had to hand) booted and ran just fine. Not very fast, but usable. Do note that I haven't yet tried installing Firefox or OpenOffice, and I probably won't be using this as my primary development machine! 8)
Distribution: multi booting whatever I feel like. Grub rocks!
Posts: 85
Rep:
I had an older pc with only 64MB of ram. I used some other distro's liveCD to create a linux swap partition on it prior to running puppy on it. When I reformatted the HD to make it one big NTFS partition (I did this because I was selling the pc) puppy would no longer boot. I think I was using 2.01 at the time.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.