ProgrammingThis forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
...
I think intptr_t is the type intended for this use.
Probably.
However, because of 'size_t' definition it's equivalent. I.e. should be big enough to accommodate any array index, and array my consist of bytes (the smallest addressable unit in "C") and be as big as the whole address space (minus "epsilon" needed for stack, program itself, etc).
So, due to
Code:
a[i] == *(a + i)
identity/property of "C" 'size_t' is big enough for any pointer.
You probably mean the 'void *arg' part. In "C" 'void *' pointer is compatible with any other pointer, i.e. pointer of any other type can be used where 'void *' pointer is expected.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.