LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming
User Name
Password
Programming This forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-02-2018, 02:45 AM   #16
JZL240I-U
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 17.3+18.3, MX-17
Posts: 4,163

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Actually I think we need free hardware bitterly (free not as free beer). When you look at the possibilities of creating mischief on user's systems via the hardware route one gets really worried -- considerung the types of humans and political systems on this planet, and I don't exempt my country from this, far from it.

No, open hardware is just one more aspect to learn and I think in the end it is not harder than the software side, we are just not used to it (yet).

<edit> P.S.: I love to learn . </edit>
 
Old 03-02-2018, 03:34 AM   #17
hazel
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: Debian, Crux, LFS, AntiX
Posts: 2,157
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 938Reputation: 938Reputation: 938Reputation: 938Reputation: 938Reputation: 938Reputation: 938Reputation: 938
Isn't the arduino a free board?
 
Old 03-02-2018, 06:50 AM   #18
MirceaKitsune
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 45

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
We were looking for a system which was secure against malware, stable against crashes, easy to understand and ran well on our existing hardware without requiring us constantly to upgrade. Free software for us was just the icing on the cake. I love the philosophy. I love the community spirit that it engenders. But I wouldn't be able to cope with a system that required me to manage my own firmware and I think a lot of other people wouldn't either. Do you really want a system that is only usable by hackers?
The idea I was going with wouldn't require anyone to do anything, just giving them the option: Components would still come with a default firmware (open or closed source), if you don't want to replace it then everything works the same way it already has for years and you feel no difference. I'm only thinking of hardware being manufactured in such a way that it allows the firmware to be replaced easily and safely by those who actively want to, while hopefully there would be people offering open firmware for at least most motherboards and video cards out there.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-04-2018, 09:39 PM   #19
username1234
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2018
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
I'm among those who take comfort in the idea of going full FOSS, which I have since I permanently made the switch to openSUSE Linux.
Unfortunately OpenSuSe does include proprietary software by default. Albeit not many, make sure you are not using them.
> https://en.opensuse.org/Free_and_Open_Source_Software

More on libre GNU/Linux distributions:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.en.html

I see other people more or less already updated you on the state of libre hardware so I will merely add some links.

There is a fully libre high end workstation and server platform available (based on IBM's open source POWER architecture). It's very expensive but I think it's totally worth it.
https://www.raptorcs.com/

There are ~10 years old fully libre business notebooks from the ThinkPad series. It is still easy to buy refurbished versions of them. They have new and modern screens (Full HD), keyboards, RAM and HDD. The processor is always the Core 2 Duo, since it was one of the last models, if not the last, not to include IME. Here are two of many sites that sell them:
https://minifree.org/
https://tehnoetic.com/
Note that the second site has some non-fully libre products, even thou all of them come close.

The pi-top is a raspberry pi based notebook. Two things must be taken into account: They are not very powerful, think of them as a very cheap computer; The raspberry Pi requires proprietary initialization code. You might want to replace it by a Banana Pi or Orange Pi.
https://pi-top.com/products/pi-top/

On general guide lines. The Free Software Foundation keeps a list of freedom respecting hardware:
https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/end...s-your-freedom

Some people think FSF's constraints are rather severe (I don't). The OpenBSD project strives for safety but not for freedom. When is doubt is always useful to check their supported hardware list.
 
  


Reply

Tags
firmware, hardware, opensource


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: The State Of Various Experimental Open-Source Projects LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-14-2013 08:33 PM
LXer: The State of Open Source Spectrometry LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-06-2012 08:41 AM
LXer: Global Summit of Open Source Leaders Releases Free Online Report on State of Commercial Open Source LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-04-2007 08:46 AM
LXer: The State of Open-Source Wi-Fi Support LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 12-29-2006 04:03 PM
LXer: Massachusetts: State of Open Source LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-16-2006 01:03 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration