LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming
User Name
Password
Programming This forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2023, 04:05 AM   #1
MakeTopSite
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2021
Location: EU
Distribution: Ubuntu, openSUSE Leap & TW, Devuan, Debian
Posts: 252

Rep: Reputation: 3
Seamonkey: "ReferenceError: structuredClone is not defined"


on jsx code:

Code:
const clone = structuredClone(someVariable);
This code works in Firefox, Chromium.

Seamonkey is not present in the Browser compatibility list:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/...tructuredClone

Does it please mean this function is not supported in Seamonkey ?
 
Old 06-07-2023, 11:03 AM   #2
astrogeek
Moderator
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware [64]-X.{0|1|2|37|-current} ::12<=X<=15, FreeBSD_12{.0|.1}
Posts: 6,267
Blog Entries: 24

Rep: Reputation: 4195Reputation: 4195Reputation: 4195Reputation: 4195Reputation: 4195Reputation: 4195Reputation: 4195Reputation: 4195Reputation: 4195Reputation: 4195Reputation: 4195
The first question I would ask is whether it works in Seamonkey. Have you tried it?

I doubt anyone here can give a definitive answer as to why Seamonkey is not included in a list on the Mozilla website. You should direct that question to Mozilla.
 
Old 06-07-2023, 12:49 PM   #3
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,226

Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
I think it's fairly self-evident that yes, that means that that function is not supported in the version of seamonkey you tested with.

Get a polyfill. Or transpile it.

Last edited by dugan; 06-07-2023 at 12:55 PM.
 
Old 06-10-2023, 02:09 AM   #4
MakeTopSite
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2021
Location: EU
Distribution: Ubuntu, openSUSE Leap & TW, Devuan, Debian
Posts: 252

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by astrogeek View Post
The first question I would ask is whether it works in Seamonkey. Have you tried it?
Yes I posted the result in the first post.
 
Old 06-10-2023, 02:11 AM   #5
MakeTopSite
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2021
Location: EU
Distribution: Ubuntu, openSUSE Leap & TW, Devuan, Debian
Posts: 252

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
I think it's fairly self-evident that yes, that means that that function is not supported in the version of seamonkey you tested with.

Get a polyfill. Or transpile it.
Thank you. I'm sorry seamonkey is not present in the Supported Browsers list https://polyfill.io/v3/supported-browsers
 
Old 06-10-2023, 07:52 AM   #6
boughtonp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,604

Rep: Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547

SeaMonkey uses Gecko - the same engine as Firefox.

As per the the SeaMonkey FAQ, the second digit in the version number corresponds to the Firefox version (with an offset of three), thus the current SeaMonkey 2.53.16 is equivalent to Firefox 56.

 
Old 06-10-2023, 09:31 AM   #7
MakeTopSite
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2021
Location: EU
Distribution: Ubuntu, openSUSE Leap & TW, Devuan, Debian
Posts: 252

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by boughtonp View Post
SeaMonkey uses Gecko - the same engine as Firefox.

As per the the SeaMonkey FAQ, the second digit in the version number corresponds to the Firefox version (with an offset of three), thus the current SeaMonkey 2.53.16 is equivalent to Firefox 56.

Thank you, Firefox 56 is pretty old and unsecure now. So current SeaMonkey is as secure as Firefox 56 ?
 
Old 06-10-2023, 10:03 AM   #8
boughtonp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,604

Rep: Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547Reputation: 2547

Security cannot be simplified to version numbers and age.

It is clear SeaMonkey makes regular releases and they explicitly state that they backport important fixes from newer Firefox versions.

The reason SeaMonkey is based on Firefox 56 is probably because Firefox 57 is when Mozilla introduced major changes with Quantum.

 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-12-2023, 02:24 AM   #9
MakeTopSite
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2021
Location: EU
Distribution: Ubuntu, openSUSE Leap & TW, Devuan, Debian
Posts: 252

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by boughtonp View Post
Security cannot be simplified to version numbers and age.

It is clear SeaMonkey makes regular releases and they explicitly state that they backport important fixes from newer Firefox versions.

The reason SeaMonkey is based on Firefox 56 is probably because Firefox 57 is when Mozilla introduced major changes with Quantum.

thank you.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] seamonkey and seamonkey-mail desktop files - wrong Terminal= option marav Slackware 2 07-13-2021 04:03 PM
Links clicked in Thunderbird open a new Seamonkey window instead of opening a new tab in currently open Seamonkey maschelsea Slackware 13 03-09-2020 05:41 PM
[BUG] in seamonkey 2.9 slackbuild; does not create usr/include/seamonkey-2.9/nss -> . zerouno Slackware 5 05-02-2012 03:21 AM
Seamonkey and Seamonkey libs update for Slackware 13.1? Lufbery Slackware 7 08-05-2011 03:00 AM
LXer: SeaMonkey 1.0.6 and SeaMonkey 1.1 Beta Released LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-09-2006 02:33 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration