LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Virtualization and Cloud
User Name
Password
Linux - Virtualization and Cloud This forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux Virtualization and Linux Cloud platforms. Xen, KVM, OpenVZ, VirtualBox, VMware, Linux-VServer and all other Linux Virtualization platforms are welcome. OpenStack, CloudStack, ownCloud, Cloud Foundry, Eucalyptus, Nimbus, OpenNebula and all other Linux Cloud platforms are welcome. Note that questions relating solely to non-Linux OS's should be asked in the General forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2011, 07:01 AM   #1
okok
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: Ubuntu Mate
Posts: 116

Rep: Reputation: 15
Specialized OS for running virtual machines and nothing more?


I am wondering whether there is a specialized distribution out there that does nothing beyond serving as a platform for running virtual machines (and therefore consumes no more than the necessary minimum system resources).

What I want is a machine for running several VMware or VirtualBox desktop OSs. I can, of course, start with any distribution (such as Ubuntu, which I use most of the time) and remove software I don't need. However, I am not a highly knowledgeable user and don't always know whether something is necessary or not, so a specialized distribution could make things easier for me.

I'd be surprised if nobody ever thought of making a desktop-oriented distribution that does just that, but I couldn't find any. Is there really no such distribution?
 
Old 12-15-2011, 08:41 AM   #2
klearview
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: London
Distribution: Debian, Kubuntu
Posts: 572

Rep: Reputation: 75
There would be very little demand for a desktop-oriented distro like this + there are minimal desktop distros so you can start with them and simply add virtualization.
 
Old 12-15-2011, 08:50 AM   #3
Juako
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 202

Rep: Reputation: 84
Go the other way: install a "server oriented" ubuntu (or similar) and add a lightweight desktop + virtualizer.
 
Old 12-15-2011, 08:45 PM   #4
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,982

Rep: Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625
Proxmox is such a distro.
vmware offers what is basically similar with their esxi server.

See also maybe a JEOS or just enough OS distro. SuseStudio can create one or there are others.
 
Old 12-15-2011, 09:28 PM   #5
klearview
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: London
Distribution: Debian, Kubuntu
Posts: 572

Rep: Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by jefro View Post
Proxmox is such a distro.
Proxmox is not a desktop-oriented distro! WTF?

(Speaking as someone who colocates half rack worth of servers running Proxmox)
 
Old 12-15-2011, 10:38 PM   #6
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,126

Rep: Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120
z/VM ?.
Introduces some (significant) restrictions of course ...
 
Old 12-16-2011, 01:10 AM   #7
okok
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: Ubuntu Mate
Posts: 116

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thank you all for the answers, which I'll now look into.
 
Old 12-16-2011, 02:13 AM   #8
novice06
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Singapore
Distribution: RHEL, CentOS
Posts: 132

Rep: Reputation: 23
Free Edition: can register and download installer
http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphe.../overview.html

RedHat Hypervisor
http://www.redhat.com/virtualization...op/hypervisor/

Windows Hypervisor
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/serve...r/hyper-v.aspx

Parallels
http://www.parallels.com/virtualization/server/

I believe you are finding bare-metal virtualization. Personally I prefer VMware ESXi
Good Luck
 
Old 12-16-2011, 12:16 PM   #9
ncsuapex
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Distribution: CentOS 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5
Posts: 770

Rep: Reputation: 44
If your hardware is supported +1 for ESXi
 
Old 12-16-2011, 05:00 PM   #10
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,982

Rep: Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625
Quote:
Originally Posted by klearview View Post
Proxmox is not a desktop-oriented distro! WTF?

(Speaking as someone who colocates half rack worth of servers running Proxmox)

Who said the phrase desktop oriented was a requirement? The OP asked for a VM only distro.

"What I want is a machine for running several VMware or VirtualBox desktop OSs. I can, of course, start with any distribution (such as Ubuntu, which I use most of the time) and remove software I don't need."

Proxmox and many others would suit the need I feel.

Last edited by jefro; 12-16-2011 at 05:02 PM.
 
Old 12-17-2011, 12:43 AM   #11
klearview
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: London
Distribution: Debian, Kubuntu
Posts: 572

Rep: Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by jefro View Post
Who said the phrase desktop oriented was a requirement?...
The OP did?

Quote:
Originally Posted by okok View Post
...I'd be surprised if nobody ever thought of making a desktop-oriented distribution that does just that...
 
Old 12-17-2011, 01:28 AM   #12
okok
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: Ubuntu Mate
Posts: 116

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks for the additional suggestions.

My intention in asking about a "desktop oriented" distribution was simply that I was looking for something I can run on a desktop computer. Perhaps it was not a good choice of words, as the (rather vague) term "desktop oriented" is often used, I think, to describe distributions that come loaded with applications for common desktop uses (office suites, media players etc.), as differentiated from ones that come with more specialized configurations.

What I have in mind is just an operating system which won't do more than what is necessary to run well VMware or VirtualBox virtual machines. Whatever does that efficiently (that is, I suppose, without running or installing on the HD all sorts of applications that aren't necessary if I don't use the host OS for nothing but as a means to run VMs) will do.
 
Old 12-17-2011, 02:18 PM   #13
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,982

Rep: Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625
I fully understood your question but thanks for the extra clarification.

My guess is VMware's esxi server is about the most basic but it has only a very limited range of servers it can run on.

You could build a pretty small distro yourself at SuseStudio.com.

You may also be interested in other ways such as netboot.me or boot.kernel.org which are examples of gpxe/ipxe booting. Similar could be made at home or from iscsi server.

I would think that it might be possible to make a bartspe disk with qemu on it too.

In a real example you could use gentoo or linux from scratch to compile a one of a kind kernel just for your computer that only had the drivers you need and then add in only the files needed to support a vm.

About half the vm apps don't offer direct gui support. They leave that to a server to display usually on a web page.

There is also JPC. http://jpc.sourceforge.net/home_home.html Try it. So a distro that only had a browser would do. Not sure there is a stand alone browser like mplayer is.
 
Old 12-18-2011, 01:34 AM   #14
okok
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: Ubuntu Mate
Posts: 116

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks, interesting ideas!
 
Old 12-18-2011, 08:57 PM   #15
Gerard Lally
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Leinster, IE
Distribution: Slackware, NetBSD
Posts: 2,177

Rep: Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761
Although it is not a Linux solution, NetBSD makes for an excellent lightweight Xen virtualization platform. Another option is to choose the Basic installation option in Salix, which is Slackware-based, and go with KVM.
 
  


Reply

Tags
virtual machines



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
running 2 virtual machines in virtualbox pete73 Linux - Server 1 07-22-2009 08:07 AM
Xen vs. VirtualBox vs. VMware. which is better for running several virtual machines? accend Linux - Server 3 05-06-2009 09:35 AM
Virtual machines running their own KVM's bill.loney Linux - Newbie 2 05-01-2009 03:08 PM
What do people think of having virtual machines running in the kernelspace? wilsonsamm Linux - General 4 10-16-2008 02:17 PM
Too many virtual machines are running cbird Linux - Software 8 10-06-2007 11:45 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Virtualization and Cloud

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration