Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I got my add-ons back with the about:config fix, but they're still labelled "could not be verified — proceed with caution". But so long as they work, Mozilla can say what they like about them. I only use Firefox for things that upset Midori, like reddit.
Is the "mozilla-firefox" repo a Mozilla repo on Slackware? Like for example, the repo I have for Google Chrome on CentOS is actually Google's repo, as that's how you get it for CentOS - it's not in any CentOS repo, or any addon repo's for CentOS, like epel, etc.
It's not a repo, it's a package. It comes from the xap folder of Slackware-14.2. The companion thunderbird package is similarly entitled mozilla-thunderbird. Don't ask me what all this means; I'm a Slackware newbie!
Wow, how exciting this all is!
At least we've learned that Vivaldi and Opera are substitutes in the meantime.
Someone even ran to Chromium! (Not good IMO).
This is a catastrophic failure for FF.
If it's caused by an external adversary - then that makes it even worse.
FF needs to be offering a free VPN.
FF needs to recommend safe search engines. Where 'statistical analysis' won't identify you.
FF needs to refer to international law or international groups to prove it is somehow 'protected'.
You have a valid point, however, if it was just an expired cert, then issue a new cert and have on with it. The bigger problem, IMO, is it puts a spotlight (rightly so) on a design flaw(s) within a) Mozilla and/or b) Firefox. The expired cert should have only prevented new addons from being installed, it should not have arbitrarily disabled everyone's addons, making the browser even less secure. Also, how they are attempting to "fix" the problem is beyond moronic and borders on incompetence or worse "by design".
I do think, however, that this is shedding light on just how much behind the scenes silliness firefox has been doing unbeknownst to the user, or most users. Reminds me the old quote/saying (do not know who to attribute it to...) "be vigilant looking for those who approach with aggression and be even more wary of those who come offering peace (safety, security etc...)."
Distribution: openSUSE(Leap and Tumbleweed) and a (not so) regularly changing third and fourth
Posts: 629
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehartman
And 60.6.2esr is there too, released at the same time, so probably with the same fixes.
I see too that Firefox 67 is going through an enormous amount of BETA's, there's already a 67.0b16 (so the 16th beta) at the mozilla site.
They always go through numerous betas - around 14-15. Fx 65 had 20 and a previous version had 18. So 16 not such a big number, relatively speaking.
Any way, I've tried numerous browsers, including chromium, vivaldi, falkon and I keep coming back to Fx. I've fixed the add-on issue thanks to the earlier post so I'll stick with it.
hazel. figured it out and installed vivaldi - but too cluttered and way too many settings for me to waste my time on. might be nice once you get it working but for me at my age - i have more important stuff to do then to waste time doing hundreds of settings on a browser.
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by petelq
They always go through numerous betas - around 14-15. Fx 65 had 20 and a previous version had 18. So 16 not such a big number, relatively speaking.
Any way, I've tried numerous browsers, including chromium, vivaldi, falkon and I keep coming back to Fx. I've fixed the add-on issue thanks to the earlier post so I'll stick with it.
Could you imagine the flack any other browser would face if they were able to remotely disable all of your addons? Why is it that Firefox should get a free pass? Or a my bad? Is this what happens when millennials start working?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.