LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-01-2015, 06:18 AM   #1
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,658

Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Very light and fast Internet Web Browser?


Hello,

I have tried:

links2 -g www.google.com
<----- here nothing else ------->
surf
iceweasel
chromium
...

I would be happy to find an internet browser than will be light as in between of links2 and iceweasel.

There is nothing in better in terms of lightweight app?

thank you. Looking forward to reading you.
 
Old 02-01-2015, 06:27 AM   #2
salasi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 4,070

Rep: Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897
Have you tried Midori? It is moderately light and quite good. There is also Qupzilla; I don't find the current build stable, but YMMV.
 
Old 02-01-2015, 06:44 AM   #3
Head_on_a_Stick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2014
Location: London, England
Distribution: Debian stable (and OpenBSD-current)
Posts: 1,187

Rep: Reputation: 285Reputation: 285Reputation: 285
It all depends on what you mean by "fast" -- the reason the browsers are resource-intensive is because the web-sites are scripted to hell & back.

According to this scripting benchmark, Chromium is the fastest browser (~31,000 on my laptop) with Firefox a close second (~29,000); the light-weight browsers (Midori, Epiphany, dwb, etc) all come out much slower (~16,000) and are quite buggy in comparison to the big players.

I swear by elinks for text-only sites and Lynx is actively developed and has good support for SSL and HTML features.
 
Old 02-01-2015, 06:47 AM   #4
cepheus11
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Germany
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 286

Rep: Reputation: 91
There are also dillo and uzbl.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-01-2015, 10:38 AM   #5
DavidMcCann
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Salix
Posts: 6,146

Rep: Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314
Fast can mean fast if given all the resources it needs, or fast on a small system. On this computer, Firefox runs like a wounded snail. I use Opera, and Midori is probably even less demanding.
 
Old 02-01-2015, 11:54 AM   #6
JWJones
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,444

Rep: Reputation: 709Reputation: 709Reputation: 709Reputation: 709Reputation: 709Reputation: 709Reputation: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Head_on_a_Stick View Post
According to this scripting benchmark, Chromium is the fastest browser (~31,000 on my laptop) with Firefox a close second (~29,000); the light-weight browsers (Midori, Epiphany, dwb, etc) all come out much slower (~16,000) and are quite buggy in comparison to the big players.
This. After being a die-hard Firefox user forever, I have now switched to Chromium, and I use links for lightweight text browsing. I find all the "lightweight" alternatives, such as midori, surf, xombrero, and netsurf to be crashy, and dillo doesn't support javascript (for better or worse).
 
Old 02-01-2015, 01:55 PM   #7
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,658

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWJones View Post
This. After being a die-hard Firefox user forever, I have now switched to Chromium, and I use links for lightweight text browsing. I find all the "lightweight" alternatives, such as midori, surf, xombrero, and netsurf to be crashy, and dillo doesn't support javascript (for better or worse).
I had impression that iceweasel is faster than chromium.
anyhow both are quite slow time to time, or rather more or less ok.
but still consume too much ram.

Surf is faster than chromium and iceweasel.

the fastest ever and quite nice is LINKS2 : links2 -g www.google.com
but it has limited features, no flash tubes,...

midori is quite like iceweasel


....
well, there arent much choices.

I like elinks.
 
Old 02-01-2015, 02:24 PM   #8
Head_on_a_Stick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2014
Location: London, England
Distribution: Debian stable (and OpenBSD-current)
Posts: 1,187

Rep: Reputation: 285Reputation: 285Reputation: 285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeratul View Post
Surf is faster than chromium and iceweasel.
http://postimg.org/image/agtx1mp23/

Last edited by Head_on_a_Stick; 02-01-2015 at 02:25 PM. Reason: better link
 
Old 02-01-2015, 02:28 PM   #9
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,144
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3482Reputation: 3482Reputation: 3482Reputation: 3482Reputation: 3482Reputation: 3482Reputation: 3482Reputation: 3482Reputation: 3482Reputation: 3482Reputation: 3482
Quote:
well, there arent much choices.
http://postmyimage.com/img2/926_uzbl.jpg

That is my screenshot of using UZBL watching youtube videos.
 
Old 02-01-2015, 02:37 PM   #10
metaschima
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,982

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Head_on_a_Stick View Post
It all depends on what you mean by "fast" -- the reason the browsers are resource-intensive is because the web-sites are scripted to hell & back.

According to this scripting benchmark, Chromium is the fastest browser (~31,000 on my laptop) with Firefox a close second (~29,000); the light-weight browsers (Midori, Epiphany, dwb, etc) all come out much slower (~16,000) and are quite buggy in comparison to the big players.

I swear by elinks for text-only sites and Lynx is actively developed and has good support for SSL and HTML features.
Or just use NoScript and be faster than any of those.
 
Old 02-01-2015, 02:57 PM   #11
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,658

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
thanks.

http://postimg.org/image/agtx1mp23/
What is your WM?

I watch youtube using quvi + mplayer to gain in rapidity.
flag + u will get xclip -o to this C program launcher of tube video.

nice screenshot of browsers
 
Old 02-01-2015, 03:06 PM   #12
Head_on_a_Stick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2014
Location: London, England
Distribution: Debian stable (and OpenBSD-current)
Posts: 1,187

Rep: Reputation: 285Reputation: 285Reputation: 285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeratul View Post
What is your WM?
That's openbox with my own theme plus tint2 for the panel.

EDIT: Well, I say "my own" theme but it's really just the "Numix" theme with the colours and borders changed so it matches with the Adwaita GTK theme and the panel...

Last edited by Head_on_a_Stick; 02-01-2015 at 03:10 PM.
 
Old 02-01-2015, 03:14 PM   #13
timl
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Fedora,CentOS
Posts: 751

Rep: Reputation: 156Reputation: 156
I'll agree with post #10. Since I added NoScript, firefox is fast enough to suit my requirements AND I like the cookie manager. The latter is something I struggled with in midori.
 
Old 02-01-2015, 03:24 PM   #14
Head_on_a_Stick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2014
Location: London, England
Distribution: Debian stable (and OpenBSD-current)
Posts: 1,187

Rep: Reputation: 285Reputation: 285Reputation: 285
Quote:
Originally Posted by timl View Post
Since I added NoScript
You can disable scripting using about:config (javascript.enabled) rather than a plug in (although it is a pain re-enabling it for the sites that need it to function).
 
Old 02-01-2015, 03:47 PM   #15
gor0
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2014
Distribution: quad BOOT!
Posts: 549

Rep: Reputation: 65
Opera

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...s#Web_browsers

 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Best fast web browser for my pc? rubankumars Linux - Software 14 01-11-2014 11:13 PM
[SOLVED] Light Weight Web Browser/File Browser CincinnatiKid Linux From Scratch 16 06-27-2012 01:37 PM
Web Browser dose not get internet 3dfx Linux - Networking 2 10-18-2011 05:29 AM
LXer: Fast forward with a Kazehakase web browser LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-28-2007 03:46 PM
Dillo Web Browser - Smoking Fast Breezwell Linux - Software 1 02-12-2004 02:44 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration