LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-26-2004, 01:53 PM   #1
sirius57
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: puppy linux, suse 10.0, opensuse 11.3, 12.1, mythdora, opensuse 13.1, opensuse tumbleweed
Posts: 602

Rep: Reputation: 36
rpm needs libc.so.6 (glibc_2.3.4)


This error stopped an rpm file from installing 'need libc.so.6 (glibc_2.3.4) ('alliance','5.0','20040928')'. I did a google search and found different versions of libc. Is this library specific to the rpm file I was trying to install? I am using Fedora core 1. Do I need to do an automatic update or get the libc rpm? I was trying to install alliance-5.0-20040928.i386.rpm.
 
Old 11-26-2004, 02:08 PM   #2
jailbait
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Debian 12
Posts: 8,340

Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
"I did a google search and found different versions of libc. Is this library specific to the rpm file I was trying to install?"

It is very common for a binary rpm to be glibc release dependent. Since a lot of your existing rpms are dependent on your existing glibc versions it is not practical to change glibc versions to accomodate your new alliance rpm package. The best thng to do is to find an alliance rpm that was compiled on the same version of gcc as your Fedora Core 1 uses. (There is a correspondence between gcc versions and glibc versions and packagers report the gcc version instead of the glibc version. rpm error messages report the glibc version.).

If you cannot find an alliance 5.0 rpm compiled against the correct gcc version then you should download the source for alliance 5.0 and compile it yourself. If you compile allience yourself I recommend that you use checkinstall to compile the source into a rpm and then install the rpm.

----------------------------------
Steve Stites
 
Old 11-26-2004, 02:10 PM   #3
bigrigdriver
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: East Centra Illinois, USA
Distribution: Debian stable
Posts: 5,908

Rep: Reputation: 356Reputation: 356Reputation: 356Reputation: 356
According to the documentation at the alliance website, the rpm was compiled on a modified RedHat 7.1 with certain libraries installed. If you don't have the same libraries, it probably won't install (or work properly if it does install).
You have a couple of alternatives.
Download and try to compile the .src.rpm on your system so that it compiles with your libraries. If it works, great. It it fails, no need to try the second alternative, the tarball.
 
Old 11-26-2004, 02:17 PM   #4
daihard
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Distribution: Kubuntu 14.04 LTS
Posts: 915

Rep: Reputation: 34
Quote:
Originally posted by bigrigdriver
According to the documentation at the alliance website, the rpm was compiled on a modified RedHat 7.1 with certain libraries installed. If you don't have the same libraries, it probably won't install (or work properly if it does install).
You have a couple of alternatives.
Download and try to compile the .src.rpm on your system so that it compiles with your libraries. If it works, great. It it fails, no need to try the second alternative, the tarball.
Red Hat 7.1 with GLIBC 2.3.4? Wow... that's a major upgrade!

Anyhow, I agree with bigrigdriver that the best alternative is to compile the source RPM (src.rpm) into your own RPM package. You can do that by running "rpmbuild --rebuild <src.rpm name>".
 
Old 11-26-2004, 09:08 PM   #5
sirius57
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: puppy linux, suse 10.0, opensuse 11.3, 12.1, mythdora, opensuse 13.1, opensuse tumbleweed
Posts: 602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 36
Ok, I did another google search 'alliance 5.0 for fedora core 1' and found a link to fedora core 1 rpm's:
alliance-5.0-20031209.i386.rpm
alliance-sources-5.0-20031209.i386.rpm
alliance-5.0-20031209.src.rpm

The rpm command would be: rpmbuild -rebuild alliance-5.0-20031209.src.rpm ?
Then install the rebuilt rpm?
 
Old 11-26-2004, 09:41 PM   #6
jailbait
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Debian 12
Posts: 8,340

Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
Just install alliance-5.0-20031209.i386.rpm. You don't need to fool with the source when the binary rpm is compatible with your system.

-------------------------
Steve Stites
 
Old 11-28-2004, 02:43 PM   #7
sirius57
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: puppy linux, suse 10.0, opensuse 11.3, 12.1, mythdora, opensuse 13.1, opensuse tumbleweed
Posts: 602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 36
Ok, the rpm installed fine. However, I am unable to figure out the command to run the software. It is not in the Gnome desktop and I can not find any reference to it when doing a file search. Also, the docs and the news groups seem to be of no help. Unless I missed something, that little detail seems lacking....
 
Old 11-28-2004, 03:01 PM   #8
jailbait
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Debian 12
Posts: 8,340

Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
"I am unable to figure out the command to run the software."

Try this command:

rpm -ql alliance | less

It will list all of the files that the rpm installed. One of the files is the command.

------------------------
Steve Stites

Last edited by jailbait; 11-28-2004 at 03:04 PM.
 
Old 11-28-2004, 04:32 PM   #9
sirius57
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: puppy linux, suse 10.0, opensuse 11.3, 12.1, mythdora, opensuse 13.1, opensuse tumbleweed
Posts: 602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 36
Yes, that was the clue! Thank you. It looks like the rpm made a new folder and sub-folders under /opt/alliance-5.0/ with docs in both html and pdf flavors and several man folders. Hopefully, all the needed info is there!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) RPM downlaod executive Linux - Software 2 03-23-2005 03:59 PM
GLIBC_2.3.4 not defined in file libc.so.6 when running gnuplot azariaya Linux - Software 7 01-05-2005 04:57 PM
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3), libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.2) needed for Linux 7.3.1 vivek_thampy Linux - Software 1 08-09-2004 04:12 PM
Which RPM contains libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) etae Linux - Software 1 09-09-2003 05:09 AM
Plz help me install libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)! packman Linux - Software 1 11-13-2002 09:35 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration