LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-26-2004, 03:02 PM   #1
Yerp
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Turtle Kevux 0.8.8
Posts: 129

Rep: Reputation: 15
Post Notice: Linux-2.4.28 + *.29pre1.patch = AGPart failure


The problem is not immediately noticed, and may not relate to the 2.4.29pre1 patch. The problem may instead be caused by: *-ow1.diff.

Files of Importance: (order patches were applied)
- linux-2.4.28.tar.bz2
- patch-2.4.29-pre1 (patched 3rd) (said "no" to all patch questions / no overwrites)
- linux-2.4.28-ow1.diff (patched 1st)
- linux-2.4.26-ntfs-2.1.6b.patch (patched 2nd)
- xorg-6.8.1

The Problem
While designing my LFS distribution, I came across a problem when trying to start xorg-6.8.1. While starting X, I received the (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI. After spending considerable time diagnosing the problem I concluded that the problem was located in the kernel where AGPart support is enabled.
I had the following kernel config for AGPart:
CONFIG_AGP=y
CONFIG_AGP_ATI=y
CONFIG_DRM=y
CONFIG_DRM_NEW=y
CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=m

I could not get directrendering (3d acceleration) even though all of the necessities were met.

The Solution
By deleting & re-unbzipping the kernel source and omitting the patch-2.4.29-pre1 patch, without reinstalling X or anything else, I succeeded into getting directrendering to work, no xorg.conf changes applied.

Possible problems could be related to the previous patches applied. the *.ow1.diff file may be the cause for this in some way..but I do not know how. It doesn't edit any of the agpart sources as far as I can tell. The problem seems to be with 2.4.29 kernel prepatch 1 (and possibly in 2 and 3). Another possibility of the problem is in the CONFIG_AGP_* support options. When I recompiled the unprepatched kernel source, I decided to not omit the rest of the CONFIG_AGP options (such as CONFIG_AGP_SIS=y. I included all of those options to play it safe (at the cost of some kernel space..). No other kernel changes applied.

I would love for more help on this problem, as I intend to move to 2.4.29 when it comes out...I stay on the bleeding edge 2.4 kernel versions.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to find agpart for "modprobe agpart" alesz Fedora 2 06-16-2005 11:10 AM
linux and windows (notice no vs.) liljhand General 11 03-17-2005 12:42 PM
signature failure on patch? 44179 SUSE / openSUSE 0 02-07-2005 07:11 PM
server or service failure notice utility ikovac Linux - Networking 2 01-05-2005 06:26 PM
Qmail failure notice dowmun *BSD 3 08-18-2003 06:28 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration