Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've just had the weirdest thing happen. I send some graphics samples in png format in a folder. So at the command line I go:
zip -r my_folder.zip ./my_folder
and zip shows that it's creating the folder and putting the images in it. I send it to a Windows user, and they report that when they unzip it, the images show "just the top" OK and the rest is jumbled! This method has worked before - I even had them send it back and I unzipped it and looked at it and everything was fine just like I sent it!
Any ideas where to start looking for the problem? Googling unfruitful so far.
Did you send one of the jpegs by itself? I mean, really, jpeg is
highly optimised, and the only advantage that zipping them gives
you is that you don't have to attach individual files. What compression
did you get, 2, 3%?
No, it was .png (portable network graphics) format. Look, I know zipping highly compressed graphics files is...ah, bogus, but the Windows-centric .asp site I am dealing with *requires* zip files in zip file format no matter what - even if it makes no sense at all! Then recievers get the files and looks at them and they're hosed.
I'm thinking that I'll write this off to a one-time jinx. If there were something wrong with zip that was this major, I'm sure I would have heard of it by now - not to mention that it would get fixed.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.