Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've been using enlightenment in an attempt to ween myself from the teet that is KDE but have been having problems with the stability of the wm. Is fluxbox a great deal more stable, and if not (or even if so) do you have any other recommendations for window managers. My main concerns are compactness and functionality. In reverse order.
Hi, I've been using fluxbox for more then 1 year and I never had one single freeze or anything like that, so for me it's pretty stable and, of course, really fast.
I'm currently using the 0.9.12 version on Slackware 10.1.
I've been using fluxbox for a long time also, it's great. Very stable, I've had a couple of issues with it's compositing and X.org's composite extension but that's pretty bleeding edge stuff. When I use psuedo-transparency it works perfectly. Go for it, it's a great WM!
i have used fluxbox for one year before i switched to fvwm and i can ensure you that it is table. tab groupping, speed, styles support,... it is a pretty good experience with fluxbox for low end computers.
Learning it is very easy, the Fluxbox is pretty straightforward, once you initiated the 'X', just click with the right button of the mouse and a menu will appear with some options, and it will create a .fluxbox/ dir in your home, there will be some files that you can edit to personalise the menus and others special configs.
Go to http://fluxbox.org/docbook.php and read the documentation, is very easy to configure menus, themes and others things on your on.
While I like KDE because of the awesome graphical modalities, Fluxbox is the smaller, simplest, fastest, mose awesome wm. It will take about a couple ours for you to getto know it, and to customize it. If you want to do more advanced things with fluxbox - the learning curve can be quite brutal, however I found I have only had to look into more advanced things every once in a while.
By the way - the last "stable/official" release is like 9 years old, so download the development version. It's really stable and I don't think you'l have a problem, despite it's being "unnoficial" -Bill
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.