Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm new to this site - so hello & more power to your mouse.
I'm running kernel version 2.4.20-8
At the moment I have to manually do:
modprobe aic7xxx
after reboot so that I can access my scsi DAT drive (without the 'modprobe' anything trying to use /dev/st0 just gets 'no such device or address'). From other threads I think it should be possible to get aic7xx loaded automatically on boot, but can't seem to make it work.
Here's my modules.conf:
alias eth0 e1000
alias eth1 e100
alias usb-controller ehci-hcd
alias usb-controller1 usb-uhci
alias scsi_hostadapter aic7xxx
Here's the output from 'lsmod' after boot but before 'modprobe aic7xxx':
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
Add the modprobe command to your /etc/rc.d/rc.local script, example below;
/sbin/modprobe aic7xxx
FYI: your kernel is really, really old, this was one of two orginal released kernels for Red Hat Linux 9 (which is out of date now). As a suggestion at least bring your system current. Visit http://www.fedoralegacy.org/ and learn how to download/install and use apt and/or yum.
I edited the 'rc.local' script as you suggested & st0 is now available immediately after boot.
I thought that 'module.conf' was supposed to enable this sort of stuff to be done without editing the 'rc' scripts.
Obviously, I'm wrong & this is just another item on my, almost infinite, list of things I don't understand.
Re: ancient kernel - yes it is - but I have to support users who don't or won't update their systems and I'm nervous about getting ahead of them in case something doesn't work when I ship them an update to my software.
If I were to update which do you think best: 'apt' or 'yum'?
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
Most prefer yum, I have used both and currently use yum. Nothing wrong with apt in a single mode environment, but I'm dual mode now and yum works better for this environment.
Dual mode == both 32-bit and 64-bit applications installed.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.