LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-31-2010, 03:00 PM   #1
johnnyblade
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware64 13.1
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
Flash Player not working in ANY browser


I recently purchased a new laptop and installed Slackware64 13.1, it works fine, but I have no Flash in my browsers. I had downloaded and installed Google Chrome, took some work, but got it working, only no Flash support. Believing this to be a problem with Chrome, I tried in FireFox, and again, no Flash support. I downloaded Opera, the same, Konqueror, ditto. I downloaded the latest Flash, (Just the libflashplayer.so in the package, isn't that a little weird?) and put it in /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins and tried Firefox again, no luck. I downloaded the latest version, installed it, but it keeps saying "firefox-bin: no such file or directory" even though it is clearly there. There is something not quite right here, and I can't seem to figure it out. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Old 07-31-2010, 03:55 PM   #2
bigrigdriver
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: East Centra Illinois, USA
Distribution: Debian stable
Posts: 5,908

Rep: Reputation: 356Reputation: 356Reputation: 356Reputation: 356
For Firefox and related browsers, copy or symlink libflashplayer.so to ~/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so.

For Opera, check the Opera website for Opera plugins.
 
Old 08-01-2010, 11:25 AM   #3
johnnyblade
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware64 13.1
Posts: 30

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Okay, I did that, but still no luck. When I looked at "about:plugins" in FireFox, it didn't have it listed, neither did Chrome. I checked the permissions of the link , it has read, write and execute, size of target is 12M but the permissions for the target were -rwxr-xr-x. I thought this might have something to do with it, so I changed it to universal rwx and just for the heck of it ran "ldconfig" but still nothing. This is most perplexing.
 
Old 08-01-2010, 11:39 AM   #4
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora38
Posts: 6,147

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
Adobe flash and a 64-bit kernel is a no no at the moment.

See here http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06...or_linux_dead/
 
Old 08-01-2010, 12:00 PM   #5
johnnyblade
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware64 13.1
Posts: 30

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Well, at least now I know. That sucks :-/ So I guess there's no way of running Flash in my browsers? What about 32-bit compatibility libraries or a slightly older version? Or am I just SOL for now?
 
Old 08-01-2010, 12:16 PM   #6
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora38
Posts: 6,147

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
Do you really need a 64-bit kernel? Unless you are running some massive database or something, you probably don't, and wouldn't notice if you switched back to a 32-bit kernel.

Maybe try it. Do you notice any difference in performance?

Or perhaps you should look at gnash ?
 
Old 08-01-2010, 12:37 PM   #7
johnnyblade
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware64 13.1
Posts: 30

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I'm using an Athlon 64 X2 processor, which is why I'm using 64-bit Slackware, perhaps I'm under the misconception that a 64-bit CPU needs a 64-bit OS? If this isn't the case, and performance isn't really hampered, then I would use 32-bit Slackware, sure. You'll have to forgive me, I've been out of the computing loop for awhile. As for usage, I got this laptop for school, mostly web access, music management, that kind of thing, but I'm also learning computer programming (school) and PC Support and administration (school). I'm not really doing any databasing, at least not yet. I've been using Linux for a long time, and I can't bring myself to use Windows on my own computer. I know how to use it and maintain it, but I just don't like it. And I don't like the idea of it being on MY computer, you know what I mean? So I guess 32-bit Linux is an option even though I'm using an AMD64 CPU?
 
Old 08-01-2010, 01:08 PM   #8
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora38
Posts: 6,147

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
Quote:
So I guess 32-bit Linux is an option even though I'm using an AMD64 CPU?
Yes.
It'll work fine for what you need. Might even be faster than the 64-bit version.

When I was talking about big databases, I meant terrabyte / exabyte sizes. This is NOT going to apply to you (but you get all sorts here on LQ!).

You might be able to get away with just replacing your 64-bit kernel with a 32-bit one, and leaving everything else alone (IE not a "complete backup, reinstall, restore" ).

Install a 32-bit kernel, boot it, does any / everything work?

I haven't used slack, but there's no harm in trying. Maybe post on the slack LQ forum along the lines of "Currently 64-bit, now want a 32-bit kernel" if you'd like authoritative advice before you start.

Good luck.
 
Old 08-01-2010, 01:27 PM   #9
johnnyblade
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware64 13.1
Posts: 30

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I'll give it a try. Couldn't hurt. Thank you so much for your help! I'll let you know how it turned out.
 
Old 08-01-2010, 02:11 PM   #10
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora38
Posts: 6,147

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
Good.

Please remember to let us know how you get on.

"Feedback" is the only sort of "payment" we get here on LQ, and it is important as it helps us help others: "That worked" or "That didn't work because .....".

Just add a quick post to this thread (bookmark it).
 
Old 08-01-2010, 02:24 PM   #11
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
I wish more people would try the sbopkg build and package manager
http://www.sbopkg.org/ it is simple it works and it is kept updated.
if you have a full install and you install the plugin it will work.
 
Old 08-01-2010, 04:50 PM   #12
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora38
Posts: 6,147

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
Quote:
I wish more people would try the sbopkg build and package manager
Hmmm. Yes, perhaps, but have you read this entire thread carefully?

Adobe have dropped support for flash on 64-bit kernels. See the posts above.

Have I misunderstanding something? I am not a slackware user, but look forward to your reply.
 
Old 08-01-2010, 08:24 PM   #13
eveningsky339
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Western Maine
Distribution: PCLinuxOS (LXDE)
Posts: 466

Rep: Reputation: 51
I'm running Flash just fine with 64-bit Lucid (and 64-bit openSUSE 11.3), so maybe a complete architecture change is not necessarily in order. I needed a shell script to get it working, but it did work.
 
Old 08-01-2010, 09:10 PM   #14
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
Quote:
Hmmm. Yes, perhaps, but have you read this entire thread carefully?
Oh yes the flash is being re-written old news very old news so use the last stable one that was written. it runs great in current if you are freaked out with security do not run it as root.
Flash will revamp and come out with a completely rebuilt system even for 32 bit.
but hey they have to.
Quote:
Adobe have dropped support for flash on 64-bit kernels. See the posts above.
go to labs it is not drop just a complete redesign. Competition and compression formats.
Quote:
Flash Player 10 for 64-bit Linux

We have temporarily closed the Labs program of Flash Player 10 for 64-bit Linux, as we are making significant architectural changes to the 64-bit Linux Flash Player and additional security enhancements. We are fully committed to bringing native 64-bit Flash Player for the desktop by providing native support for Windows, Macintosh, and Linux 64-bit platforms in an upcoming major release of Flash Player. We intend to provide more regular update information on our progress as we continue our work on 64-bit versions of Flash Player. Thank you for your continued help and support. Stay tuned to the Flash Player discussion forum for further announcements.
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/f...r10/64bit.html

Last edited by Drakeo; 08-01-2010 at 09:19 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Browser crash-seems flash player related-Facebook Scrabble coro35 Linux - Newbie 4 07-05-2009 07:15 AM
cant watch videos from web due to no flash player in browser vivek2407 Linux - Newbie 2 08-07-2008 03:09 AM
no audio flash player firefox 32-bit browser, RHEL4, x86_64. saak.stepi Linux - Software 1 01-11-2008 07:05 PM
LXer: Access adds Flash player to embedded Linux, browser LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-27-2007 05:31 AM
Flash Player Not Working redneon Linux - Software 2 07-07-2004 02:54 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration