Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've just started playing around with CentOS on an old box and thought I'd revisit my backup requirements. Until now I've been using tar, with a brief but not completely successful stint using star.
I've just discovered dar, and as I backup to DVDs, it's ability to produce multiple "slices" to fit across disks is very attractive. What I can't tell from Googling is how well supported/regarded dar is as a product. What I've seen does seem positive though.
Does anyone have much experience with dar, and do you think I am running a risk of having backups that aren't particulalry useful, or is there anything else I should know?
Things I like about DAR:
a) dar archives each file individually. So, if a file is corrupt, you risk only one file, not the entire archive. Tar archives are one large archive. If part of it is corrupt, you loose the entire backup.
b) restore of files is easy. restore one file, a directory, or the entire backup. All equally easy.
c) easy to verify a backup as soon as it's made.
d) easy to list the contents of a backup.
e) dar can include the static version of dar on the media (seperate from the backup) to make restoration easier if the system isn't bootable until restored.
f) many more reasons. these are my top five.
You should also look into the GUI version Kdar.
Try it out. Follow the tutorial and try each operation as listed. When you get to the end, I've no doubt that you will feel assured that DAR will work for you.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.