Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Sure, but if you're still on CentOS 7 there's enough time to see if/how the Rocky team prove themselves when 8 is EOLed.
We're in the middle of moving to the cloud. CentOS 7 is dead for us.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boughtonp
Use what as a reference? If Rocky consists of CentOS contributors, one would hope they already know RHEL well enough without needing to refer to Springdale. :/
Some are new. As I understand it, most of CentOS devs are RH employees. Some of SL devs might join too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boughtonp
?!?
They are different.
Good to know. Although I need that 5y cycle. I might play with it anyway or use it for our bleeding edge systems.
Springdale Linux (formerly PUIAS Linux) is an RHEL clone that currently offers EL8.3 boot disk and repositories. It is a small project providing binaries built from the RedHat sources for use in a number of US based universities, some workstation and I gather mostly clusters.
The Web site has links to the 8.3 boot disks, and repositories are on that same /data tree. There is a mailing list run via Google groups, searching on springdale-users will find it. The project is mentioned in the link below...
No. I went to their website and looked for source code.
Your argument doesn't make much sense, really. So what you're saying is that you're not going to use an open-source community driven project, because it's created by a company whose main product is commercial? Doesn't seem too clever to me. Not that I'd recommend cloudlinux necessarily, but at least make your decision based on sensible arguments.
On another train of thoughts: Ubuntu can be used in production without any issues. The only "problem" would be that it offers only 5-year support - which is normally more than reasonable.
Given that Centos 7 is EOL in 2024, there's still enough time to weigh up your options, as a lot of projects that already rely heavily on CentOS are obviously going to need to find alternatives (for instance cpanel say they're going to support Ubuntu LTS in late 2021 and that they're going to support the cloudlinux-supported project Lenix also).
Distribution: openSUSE, Raspbian, Slackware. Previous: MacOS, Red Hat, Coherent, Consensys SVR4.2, Tru64, Solaris
Posts: 2,803
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by uteck
Oracle Linux is based on RHEL much like CentOS is/was. So should be about the same experience. https://www.oracle.com/linux/
Except now you have to deal with Oracle.
I have to wonder about those using CentOS on "production" servers. At places where I've worked using RHEL in production, CentOS was often used for the development and test environments. Worked just like production but you didn't pay for support in your non-prod environments. Those folks are screwed now. If you switch to Stream, your dev/test environment is ahead of production in some ways so you would might need to wait for RHEL to catch up to Stream before deploying new software. That's going to be an interesting variable to include in one's project plans.
In attempting to find a solution to "What other than CentOS" I found Oracle Linux. I had an issue where the installer was unable to find any disks on my Dell PowerEdge, and I learned that the Oracle guys decided to remove kernel modules to read my drives. I'm sure it's a good distro, but they need to get those kernel modules or I'm sticking with other solutions.
Another solution? OpenSUSE might be a good option, it's mostly neutral (does not really tick off the sysadmin community) and it's pretty good as far as stability goes. They even have an enterprise solution with support, but I've never used it so cannot with a good conscious vouch for it, but it is worth a try.
When you want to keep the RedHat-Style and are used to it, the only reliable/stable option is buying a RHEL-subscription after the support for CentOS 7 ends. Rockylinux is just in the planning, Scientific may be revived but is not there now, Oracle has too many other "closed-shop"-issues, Fedora is somehow the same like "CentOS-Stream" and not fit for enterprise-use.
We are using Dell-Servers too and pure Debian runs very well on them and for VMs you can use Debian too, or Alpine or Arch. Also actual iDrac-Cards, since Gen8, can do everything that you needed "OMSA" for before and additionally that OMSA-stuff could run too on Debian.
Most likely you don't have to make a decision right now anyways, C7 is maintained until June 30, 2024.
Distribution: Mint 20.1 on workstation, Debian 11 on servers
Posts: 1,336
Rep:
I'm still on Cent OS 6.10 on lot of my servers/VMs as I just never got around to upgrading everything, but I'm definitely in a situation where I need to upgrade now as all the repositories are dead so even if I want to install something I can't without jumping through lot of hoops, let alone, not getting updates. Already did a few boxes so far and went Debian 10.
It does a lot of things differently and there's lot of weird quicks I find... lot of stuff that is just not right out of the box. Like the user not being in sudoers file and having to google how to do that. just little things like that, which are really annoying to have to deal with when you have a bunch of boxes to do.
I will experiment with preseed files so I can try to automate a lot of that stuff though. Though Rocky Linux might still be a viable route, I may still look at that.
From what I understand Debian has a decent support life as well.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.