Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
09-22-2009, 05:21 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 4
Rep:
|
Share file on memory (like on tmpfs) via NFS (or alternatives)
Hi,
I want to store some file on tmpfs or any memory-based file system for better performance and share it via NFS or any protocal that can be used to mount folder. However, from the NFS faq, NFS doesn't support tmpfs.
Could anyone suggest a solution to achieve this?
|
|
|
09-22-2009, 10:09 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852
|
I tried it here on my machines and it looks like you need to put "fsid=0" in the export options for the share mounted on tmpfs, at which point it appears to work fine.
I have looked around online to figure out exactly what that option means, and it appears it is an NFS4 thing that sets that particular share as the root of the pseudo-filesystem. So this option might be a problem if you need to have multiple exports, though on my server I was still able to mount one of my other shares while I had the tmpfs share active.
Maybe somebody with more intimate knowledge of NFS could clear this up. I don't know if the option is safe to use in a production environment or not.
|
|
|
09-22-2009, 10:56 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 4
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thank MS3FGX for your suggestion. I'd try that out. I'm not sure if it works with NFSv3 since I used only NFSv3.
|
|
|
04-01-2011, 04:22 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
I would like to know as well
Hi.
I've tried add option "fsid=0" on /etc/exports as MS3FGX told.
>
/data/tmpfs xxx.xxx.196.88(rw,fsid=0,async,no_root_squash)
<
But I still see error in /var/log/message
>
Mar 30 14:12:14 xen1 mountd[5902]: authenticated mount request from xxx.xxx.196.88:672 for /data/tmpfs (/data/tmpfs)
Mar 30 14:12:14 xen1 mountd[5902]: Cannot export /data/tmpfs, possibly unsupported filesystem or fsid= required
<
of course I'm using NFSV4 as below
[root@xen1 /]# rpcinfo -p
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100024 1 udp 666 status
100024 1 tcp 669 status
100011 1 udp 928 rquotad
100011 2 udp 928 rquotad
100011 1 tcp 931 rquotad
100011 2 tcp 931 rquotad
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100003 3 udp 2049 nfs
100003 4 udp 2049 nfs
100021 1 udp 54051 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 54051 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 54051 nlockmgr
100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs
100003 4 tcp 2049 nfs
100021 1 tcp 33064 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 33064 nlockmgr
100021 4 tcp 33064 nlockmgr
100005 1 udp 942 mountd
100005 1 tcp 945 mountd
100005 2 udp 942 mountd
100005 2 tcp 945 mountd
100005 3 udp 942 mountd
100005 3 tcp 945 mountd
What is the problem? Is there anything I have to do more setting?
Please let me know...
Thank you for reading.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|