Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Since you need an "urgent" answer, go look on Red Hats website, and read the release notes. And you also need to read the LQ rules and question guidelines.
rhel7 has newer , updated packages than rhel6. Also support for the consumer would be more time with rhel7. Everyone should upgrade to newer version before support expires.
@TB0ne and John VV: if you can't manage answering a question properly then feel free to pass up on posting. Deliberately not answering the question properly but allowing your own irritation at the thread title and possibly the terseness of the question to take over is not the way to go. While there is something to be said for educating 1st posters this is not the welcome we would like 1st posters to be greeted with, it does not bode well for the future and it is not a good example for others.
@TB0ne and John VV: if you can't manage answering a question properly then feel free to pass up on posting. Deliberately not answering the question properly but allowing your own irritation at the thread title and possibly the terseness of the question to take over is not the way to go. While there is something to be said for educating 1st posters this is not the welcome we would like 1st posters to be greeted with, it does not bode well for the future and it is not a good example for others.
Sorry, but I feel like I *DID* answer it properly. I directed the OP to the Red Hat website, which has full release notes for both versions, from which the differences can be derived. I also pointed the OP to the "Question Guidelines" link, which Jeremy suggested we do for such posts.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne
Sorry, but I feel like I *DID* answer it properly. I directed the OP to the Red Hat website, which has full release notes for both versions, from which the differences can be derived. I also pointed the OP to the "Question Guidelines" link, which Jeremy suggested we do for such posts.
We created the link http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...#faq_lqwelcome for just this purpose. If there are threads you think this is applicable to in the future and you'd like to address them, please include a short friendly note and a direct link so the OP can better understand how LQ works and how they can participate effectively moving forward.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.