LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-03-2008, 05:03 PM   #1
shamimzaki
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
CentOS 4 or CentOS 5 for Production Server


Hello,

I am planning to deploy a server which will run VPN Server, LAMP Server. I have CentOS 4.6 and CentOS 5.0 and CentOS 5.2 in my hand. Which release i should deploy and why i am going to chose that. The hardware is quiet new.

And is there any criteria to choose a release of a specific distribution for a production deployment.

Thanks for your help.

Regards,
Shamim A M Zaki
 
Old 10-03-2008, 06:09 PM   #2
watcher69b
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: /home/watcher69b
Distribution: RH, Fedora & CentOS
Posts: 552

Rep: Reputation: 41
I like to use the newest distros with new hardware. CentOS 5.2 is what i use on most of my linux servers
it is a great platform and good with most RAID cards
 
Old 10-03-2008, 06:21 PM   #3
sycamorex
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,836
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251Reputation: 1251
Yeah, as watcher69b said, why would you like to use old versions with new hardware? Get 5.2
 
Old 10-03-2008, 07:15 PM   #4
rossonieri#1
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 359

Rep: Reputation: 34
hi shamim,

AFAIK - if i'm not mistaken - by default centos 4.6 is still using the old MySQL 4 with Apache 2.0 PHP 4 (of course you still can upgrade it), whereas centos 5 using the newer MySQl 5 Apache 2.2 PHP 5. so which one do you prefer? mostly i agree with the rest of the guys.
 
Old 10-04-2008, 12:57 AM   #5
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora
Posts: 3,935
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
While both RHEL 4.x / 5.x (and, by extension, CentOS 4.x / 5.x) can be considered very stable, I generally will opt for the major version with the least potential for disruptive updates. To get an idea of what I'm talking about, refer to the RHEL life cycle:

https://www.redhat.com/security/updates/errata/

RHEL 4 will be in the production 2 phase for less than one year, after which time it will enter production 3. RHEL 5 will continue to be in production 2 until 2012. As indicated by the Life Cycle Phase chart, production 3 is the least potentially disruptive part of the life cycle.

For the types of services I run on RHEL, change ain't good. So if I were in your shoes, it'd be a no-brainer: run the latest version in the CentOS 4.x branch.

YMMV.
 
Old 10-04-2008, 01:32 PM   #6
shamimzaki
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks "anomie" for your nice perspective regarding choosing the release version.

Sorry, as I am a newbie, I am asking mre.

Your perspective fits very good when you know what is going to run on that server.

As "rossonieri#1" mentioned CentOS 4 runs PHP 4 and CentOS 5 runs PHP 5. So there is a chance some one want to put a PHP 5 script in the server. How I am going to support him if I stick with CentOS 4.

What is the real life scenario in a web hosting environment ?

Regards
Shamim
 
Old 10-05-2008, 01:35 AM   #7
rossonieri#1
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 359

Rep: Reputation: 34
@ shamim

Quote:
So there is a chance some one want to put a PHP 5 script in the server. How I am going to support him if I stick with CentOS 4.

and this - put them together..

What is the real life scenario in a web hosting environment ?
if you are trying to start a new environment - go ahead with the latest STABLE RELEASE - since newer web apps require newer system environment (and not to mention : people do like new things, and you as a service provider - need to make an environmental decision). just go with the STABLE branch. There is no wrong to start with the older version - but believe me, to upgrade things will cause you a lot of efforts/hardworks.

As far as OS stability - IMHO and experiences both CentOS 4 & 5 (i havent tried that 5.2) are stable enough for heavy web access.

HTH.

Last edited by rossonieri#1; 10-05-2008 at 01:38 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: CentOS Directory Server On CentOS 5.2 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-06-2008 09:20 PM
printer setup from Centos 5 to Vista home prem. on a headless centos pc ncsuapex Red Hat 6 03-10-2008 11:40 AM
LXer: Install CentOS 5 DomU on CentOS 5 Dom0(64 bit) from NFS share LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-09-2007 03:41 AM
LXer: CentOS announces CentOS 5 i386 Live CD LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-11-2007 07:01 AM
update centos 4 rc1 to centos 4 trou yum? maxut cAos 2 03-04-2005 02:36 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration