LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-10-2010, 07:04 PM   #1
mesh2005
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Ägypten
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.10
Posts: 155

Rep: Reputation: 30
Can one NFS server serve 400 users? (heavy use)


I have around 400 users and wanna use NFS to manage their home directories. Is there a limit on the number of concurrent connections the NFS server can handle?
 
Old 04-10-2010, 07:25 PM   #2
MS3FGX
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 361Reputation: 361Reputation: 361Reputation: 361
As I understand it, the NFS daemon itself supports an unlimited number of concurrent connections; but as each connection takes up a unique port on the system you would be limited by the number of unused TCP/IP ports on the server.

In any event, that number would be considerably higher than 400, so I doubt you would have a problem. The bigger issue with that many users would be the speed of the system and I/O performance to the disk(s).
 
Old 04-10-2010, 07:28 PM   #3
mesh2005
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Ägypten
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.10
Posts: 155

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS3FGX View Post
As I understand it, the NFS daemon itself supports an unlimited number of concurrent connections; but as each connection takes up a unique port on the system you would be limited by the number of unused TCP/IP ports on the server.

In any event, that number would be considerably higher than 400, so I doubt you would have a problem. The bigger issue with that many users would be the speed of the system and I/O performance to the disk(s).
Thank you very much for ur reply. Is there anyway I can estimate the hardware I need so that the 400 users would not have any issues?
 
Old 04-11-2010, 10:01 AM   #4
huwnet
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: England
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
You haven't really given enough information for us to give any sort of hardware estimation . Is it 400 users total or 400 users connected at the same time? What sort of work is going on? Office work with a few small documents or graphic work with lots of large files? What will be the approx size of each home directory?
 
Old 04-11-2010, 10:05 AM   #5
mesh2005
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Ägypten
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.10
Posts: 155

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by huwnet View Post
You haven't really given enough information for us to give any sort of hardware estimation . Is it 400 users total or 400 users connected at the same time? What sort of work is going on? Office work with a few small documents or graphic work with lots of large files? What will be the approx size of each home directory?
sorry about that. 400 users is the total number; may or may not be connected at the same time. Documents are mainly small with a max quota of 500MB per user.

Thanks!
 
Old 04-11-2010, 05:05 PM   #6
btmiller
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: In the DC 'burbs
Distribution: Arch, Scientific Linux, Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 4,290

Rep: Reputation: 378Reputation: 378Reputation: 378Reputation: 378
The answer is "it depends". Can you estimate the total amount of bandwidth the users will need (better leave a margin of error)? Will your network connection be able to provide that bandwidth (you could always use 10 gigabit Ethernet or link aggregation)? Will the disk subsystem be able to handle the bandwidth (there's a big difference between a single ancient 5400 RPM IDE drive and a PCI-express RAID card running a RAID-10 array of 15K PM SCSI disks)?

If it's just light, office type use, I'd say yes if you up the maximum number of nfsd threads (I think the default is 8 or 12 in RHEL), but there's really not enough information here.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best mice for heavy PC users? halfpower General 20 04-05-2010 03:49 PM
E-Mail server discussion, to serve or not to serve? gankoji Linux - Server 8 08-05-2009 10:13 AM
heavy cpu and network usage by evolution-data-server xadies Linux - Software 1 06-07-2007 01:14 PM
web server ,dns serve,mysql server ibrahimovhasan Linux - Newbie 4 05-11-2005 03:29 AM
nfs client should it use tcp or udp to nfs serve rportmapper andersonas Linux - Networking 2 06-30-2004 12:05 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration