[SOLVED] can't access Centos 7 apache server default page (Server not found)

Jjanel · 10-12-2016, 05:27 PM

Wow, you stayed up all night, working on this! A 'true' IT admin

A [great?] idea has come to me: 'ask' cestos 'how' your ssh is IP-CONNECTing, by simply:

netstat -nt | grep :22

I'm 'betting' it may say ..122.1
IF so, on win, *try* browsing that address!

Did you 'study'*win host*'s [dos=run cmd] `netstat -rn` ??
Did we ever get to see any of the web or ssh traffic in tcpdump?
Did you find anything in the logs? a 'fav' cmd: ls -latr ("later" but e is an invalid switch) /var/log
ls -latr /var/log

c0wb0y · 10-12-2016, 05:30 PM

It depends on your primary purpose. If you just want to learn and experimentation and you think that firewall/selinux is getting in the way, you can leave it off for now.

In saying that, learning networking, firewall (and bit of SELinux, maybe) is a must. So it depends what's your immediate goal.

Fardad74 · 10-12-2016, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Habitual

Disabling SELinux is safe?

I just typed SELinux's "setenforce 1" immediately, i meant about iptables for these experiments that i'm trying . my SELinux actually is running all the time.

Jjanel · 10-12-2016, 05:34 PM

Ooops, 'ninja'ed again, from my sloww [&still terrible] writing ability...

Still, I'd like to see the netstat -nt, to see where it thinks ssh is coming from
(I'm un-betting, back to .2.2; so I guess .122. virbr0 is irrelevant here; [what's it for/do?])
Also, what is 'up' with .2.2 [gw] vs. why you think win is .2.1?
(the netstat -rn *on win*!) Or win> ipconfig/all

Fardad74 · 10-12-2016, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jjanel

Wow, you stayed up all night, working on this! A 'true' IT admin

A [great?] idea has come to me: 'ask' cestos 'how' your ssh is IP-CONNECTing, by simply:

netstat -nt | grep :22

I'm 'betting' it may say ..122.1
IF so, on win, *try* browsing that address!

Did you 'study'*win host*'s [dos=run cmd] `netstat -rn` ??
Did we ever get to see any of the web or ssh traffic in tcpdump?
Did you find anything in the logs? a 'fav' cmd: ls -latr ("later" but e is an invalid switch) /var/log
ls -latr /var/log

tcp6 0 0 :::80 :::* LISTEN 6746/httpd
tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN 1770/sshd

Fardad74 · 10-12-2016, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jjanel

Ooops, 'ninja'ed again, from my sloww [&still terrible] writing ability...

Still, I'd like to see the netstat -nt, to see where it thinks ssh is coming from
(I'm un-betting, back to .2.2; so I guess .122. vbrg0 is irrelevant here; [what's it for/do?])

eno16777736 is my current net interface

Fardad74 · 10-12-2016, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jjanel

Ooops, 'ninja'ed again, from my sloww [&still terrible] writing ability...

Still, I'd like to see the netstat -nt, to see where it thinks ssh is coming from
(I'm un-betting, back to .2.2; so I guess .122. virbr0 is irrelevant here; [what's it for/do?])
Also, what is 'up' with .2.2 [gw] vs. why you think win is .2.1?
(the netstat -rn *on win*!) Or win> ipconfig/all

[root@localhost logs]# netstat -nt
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 0 0 192.168.2.128:22 192.168.2.1:3250 ESTABLISHED
tcp 1 0 192.168.2.128:44877 192.168.2.128:80 CLOSE_WAIT

c0wb0y · 10-12-2016, 05:43 PM

That's why I was asking for output of iptables -nvL and was about to give up when none was received. Perhaps, specific traffic such as icmp/http explicitly blocked? I don't know as no ouput was supplied.

The gateway at 2.2 has no relevance in this instance as the 2 nodes (on the same subnet) who tried to communicate with each other do not require IP routing.

Jjanel · 10-12-2016, 05:45 PM

I think that's [netstat] -ln, Listen, not -t, TCP *CONNECTions*...
netstat -nt

Thanks for you patience! I'm learning a lot too!

(and 'who' [ipconfig/all] *win* 'think it is' [IPaddresses on its various interfaces] ??)

p.s. when I saw: "my centos hadn't any iptables installed",
I skipped the whole firewall issue, since I barely today discovered:
iptables -L (to see if ?any? firewall is 'running')

Jjanel · 10-12-2016, 05:46 PM

oh, ok on the netstat 2.128 :22

... but still looking for (to complete my understanding/learning):
(and 'who' [ipconfig/all] *win* 'thinks it is' [IPaddresses on its various interfaces] ??)

Fardad74 · 10-12-2016, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jjanel

Wow, you stayed up all night, working on this! A 'true' IT admin

A [great?] idea has come to me: 'ask' cestos 'how' your ssh is IP-CONNECTing, by simply:

netstat -nt | grep :22

I'm 'betting' it may say ..122.1
IF so, on win, *try* browsing that address!

Did you 'study'*win host*'s [dos=run cmd] `netstat -rn` ??
Did we ever get to see any of the web or ssh traffic in tcpdump?
Did you find anything in the logs? a 'fav' cmd: ls -latr ("later" but e is an invalid switch) /var/log
ls -latr /var/log

maybe some others laugh or ridiciuling me but after 2 days finally i saw the first web page that i created as sample in my life (a very basic work in servering).
currently i can sleep...

Fardad74 · 10-12-2016, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jjanel

I think that's [netstat] -ln, Listen, not -t, TCP *CONNECTions*...
netstat -nt

Thanks for you patience! I'm learning a lot too!

(and 'who' [ipconfig/all] *win* 'think it is' [IPaddresses on its various interfaces] ??)

one interesting thing was that i had the ping of vmnet1 the upper right interface in the picture that is in another subnet 192.168.206.x/24. i think because it is wired.

Jjanel · 10-12-2016, 05:59 PM

Oh, I see the .2.1 Hmmmm, I wonder why guest has .2.2[?] Vmware 'magic', I guess...

Can you get a 'dos terminal [run cmd]' on your winX? (it's VERY useful to know how...)
& do the:
netstat -rn (&post screen shot; THEN you can get sleep

Fardad74 · 10-12-2016, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jjanel

Oh, I see the .2.1 Hmmmm, I wonder why guest has .2.2[?] Vmware 'magic', I guess...

Can you get a 'dos terminal [run cmd]' on your winX? (it's VERY useful to know how...)
& do the:
netstat -rn (&post screen shot; THEN you can get sleep

yes , i wondered,too before i disable firewalls gateway became 2.2!!! while it should be 2.255

Jjanel · 10-12-2016, 06:40 PM

Thanks!! Good night

.255 is a "broadcast" (like .0)
.1.x must be your ISP/internet connection [sub]net.
I see .2.1 but .2.2 must be some vmware 'magic', that ?logically replaces [on guest]?
what 'we' think should be .2.1 (thus ping .2.2, not .2.1, works=is-required). Idk...

I had an idea, for my learning: IF you could give me the exact cmds to recreate this problem (at LinuxZoo.org; I don't have 'resources' myself)