Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Have a aging but still solidly performing dell d620 that I use for daily use as a developer toy and training tool and am wanting to run a small little "home server" to host two of my blogs and a friend's blog or two and to host cloud based snapshots for when I can't / don't choose to use Ubuntu / gdrive /dropbox or the like, I'm familiar with the desktop versions of ubuntu and fedora/opensuse but none of the server versions....Heard CentOS would be a solid lightweight option but this box is x86 and I only see x64 versions any recommendations, I'd prefer a rather simply to use Rpm - based setup with reliable speed and security if at all possible given the current setups' constraints...
thanks and seeing as its loosely based on both suse and fedora should be rather simple to configure either one on top correct? thanks for quick reply and link TobiSGD... however getting and port 443 file or DL not found any other ideas for a direct link didn't see it in x86 on distrowatch either..
Last edited by linuxdev2013; 03-12-2014 at 02:56 PM.
While it isn't RMP based (it's based on Slackware, for starters) it does come with a lot of toys and it's design to be a "home server" ...
thanks smokey-justme will look into that is it as compilation heavy as I've heard slackware to be, not against compiling as I'm an android firmware debugger on the side but not wanting to be taxing the porr old box of mine at 250% endlesssly...
in either case given a 30gb install with seperate /home on a 250gb how much should I allocate to the server install on my box ? I have cloud storage if need be for either the heisenberg install or the server but jsut curious what best practice for partitioning whether on encrypted drive or not is in the server world....thanks again for the help folks
Last edited by linuxdev2013; 03-12-2014 at 03:20 PM.
thanks and seeing as its loosely based on both suse and fedora should be rather simple to configure either one on top correct? thanks for quick reply and link TobiSGD... however getting and port 443 file or DL not found any other ideas for a direct link didn't see it in x86 on distrowatch either..
I'm sorry but I don't know what port 443 has to do with any of this..
---
Now, regarding Superb Mini Server... It's Slckware based but with a lot of additions for home server usage.. Only CLI and a prepared Webmin.. If you don't have some extra programs that aren't found int SMS by default or in the main Slackware repository then, indeed, you have to compile... But just for file sharing and http, that won't be the case..
It's worth a try, in my opinion, but hey.. your system, your rules..
---
Now, regarding Superb Mini Server... It's Slckware based but with a lot of additions for home server usage.. Only CLI and a prepared Webmin.. If you don't have some extra programs that aren't found int SMS by default or in the main Slackware repository then, indeed, you have to compile... But just for file sharing and http, that won't be the case..
It's worth a try, in my opinion, but hey.. your system, your rules..
that's quite alright just wasn't wanting a arch linux meets slack type setup if you feel me there.... thanks for the help and explainations
Re post #19: Centos isn't based on Suse and only loosely based on Fedora; its actually a free rebuild of RHEL; hence suitability for a Server
(clarifying, Fedora is RH's R&D distro and is thus several 'versions' ahead - if it works good in Fedora, it'll probably end up in RHEL sometime later...)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.