12GB RAM installed in Dell Poweredge4600 but Fedora9 only sees 4GB
Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
12GB RAM installed in Dell Poweredge4600 but Fedora9 only sees 4GB
We have a Dell Poweredge server with two Xeon CPUs and 12GB of PC1600 RAM installed. We use Fedora9 as the enterprise OS server.
We cannot seem to get the system to use/see more than 4GB of RAM.
Can anyone provide a step-by-step procedure to resolve this?
We have done searches and received bits and pieces of advice but still see only 4GB. 8GB of RAM is sitting idle except for the BIOS memory count during boot.
The Fedora9 OS we are using is 32bit. We did download the pae module and tried to follow the Red Hat documentation on performing the upgrade. Obviously we did something wrong because we still only see 4GB.
What we need is a step-by-step procedure on how to upgrade to pae with verifications on each step. Any URLs, links, suggestions would be appreciated.
I did exactly as you stated
yum list available kernel-pae
I did a
yum install
on the pae kernel, rebooted
but still only see 4GB
below is the result I got for 'uname -srvo'
Linux 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Mon Aug 4 14:08:11 EDT 2008 GNU/Linux
I don't see any hint of pae in the above output
In my humble opinion, there was a necessary step that we skipped between the 'yum install nnnnnnpae' and the reboot.
I did disable the SELINUX before doing any of the above.
Please advise.
Selecting the first option (Fedora (2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686.PAE)) will boot it for you. Selecting "Fedora (2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686)" will boot the standard kernel.
I don't see why you need to comment out any other kernels.
I'm pretty sure grub numbers things from zero, so the default boot will be the second entry (default=1) which is non PAE. I'd make sure everything works though before I changed it (to default=0).
When the grub menu comes up, hitting any key should bring the menu with various boot options up.
Rgds
Edit - I don't recall the exact effect of "hiddenmenu". I think this just means the menu is hidden unless you hit a key when the first grub message comes up, but you may need to comment this line out - try it first.
Last edited by billymayday; 09-04-2008 at 03:32 PM.
I think the reason they put in the hiddenmenu option is in order to make the machine act like a windows bootloader? Anyone changing this setting obviously knows what they are doing...
I don't use SELinux anywhere, I don't have any need for it! Are you sure you do? SELinux is, IMHO, overkill for most applications. Do you need it for something specific?
Although I have not yet succeeded in doing so, I have read that we can use SELINUX to create security policies across a network of Linux client-server, similar to what is used in a Windows domain. This feature would understandably be of great importance to our clients who may need more than just the file permissions security.
Unfortunately the Fedora documentation on the subject is hard to follow. In our limited experience with them, the pre-installed SELINUX policies seem to hinder normal operations. For example, we couldn't get SELINUX to allow the normal operation of SpamAssassin with our Sendmail and Cyrus email server setup. I had to set SELINUX to permissive.
I suppose this would/should be a topic for a separate thread.
Is there a another/better way to accomplish security policies in Linux networks?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.