Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Maybe explain what you mean by secure? For example, are you referring to which has less publicly-known vulnerabilities? It's much better if you just straight-out ask exactly what you want to know - specifically. Then you can use that information to help you with your risk assessment. BTW, you do realize these are products with different purposes, right?
Maybe explain what you mean by secure? For example, are you referring to which has less publicly-known vulnerabilities? It's much better if you just straight-out ask exactly what you want to know - specifically. Then you can use that information to help you with your risk assessment. BTW, you do realize these are products with different purposes, right?
I'm interested in the one which has less publicly-known vulnerabilities.
I'm interested in the one which has less publicly-known vulnerabilities.
Well, if we look at their Secunia pages, we get that cPanel has seven advisories (one of which is unpatched), while Webmin has twelve advisories, all which have been patched. We can also observe that the average criticality level of the advisories seem to favor cPanel. It would be a good idea, of course, to look at other vulnerability databases before reaching any conclusions. Also, maybe look at the timespan between public vulnerability disclosures and patch availability for each product, and don't forget that you're comparing two very different applications.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.