Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: FreeBSD,Debian, RH, ok well most of em...
Posts: 238
Rep:
strange question
I have an odd question. I have been looking for a way to make a "poor man's" Interspect. Checkpoint has a "system" that sits on a segment. It watches all traffic (at layer 2 I assume) for packet signatures and matches them to a database of virus or IDS signatures. If it sees a positive match it will block all traffic from the offending machine and disable any routes. Effectively keeping "bad" systems from infecting other non-patched systems on the LAN.
I know that I can put my firewall in bridged mode dropping it to layer 2 as a network hop basically but still filtering per my rules. I can also add Snort to beef up what is seen and alert. My question is, how could I also effectively block an offending machine?
My assumption is an auto-rule to "block any from offending ip".
One other question; since snort just watches the traffic, not route it, wouldn't it be possible for a host to be infected/compromised before snort could process the rule and send back a rst packet?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.