Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
In terms of origin, vulnerabilities and security fixes I think the old maintainers page sums it up pretty well, else you can check the CVE, the NVD or any changelog for any recent release of the package. For instance the latest CentOS-5 release is 0.17-29.2.2 which is based on netkit-0.17 which was released in 2001. And indeed there have not been any security fixes in recent years. In terms of use talkd doesn't have any authentication or authorisation features (I know of) other than its invitation tables and such and in general it is suggested it shouldn't be run at all or only when confined to a LAN (implying "trusted" users). Since it runs out of Xinetd you can use all of its tcpwrapper-like and other filters to mitigate risk by regulating access in addition to firewalling.
We are only using it to communicate over the local lan.
Just figured it would be faster than msn.
At the moment it just keeps freezing and the checking for invitation so i thought we might have to try something else. I thought it would work easy as we both have the exact same distro
That's funny. You considered MSN over a public internet, through servers managed by others, with all the exploits that hit online chat programs and ask about talk security! :-0
Connection refused means the talk daemon is not listening; could be it is not running, or that it is not listening on interfaces other than the loopback interface. The remote server needs to be listening on the appropriate interfaces.
There is an older protocol of talk (long ago); I doubt anyone is using it today, but both ends must be running the newer version.
i have installed talk on both laptops using apt-get
Quote:
Connection refused means the talk daemon is not listening; could be it is not running, or that it is not listening on interfaces other than the loopback interface. The remote server needs to be listening on the appropriate interfaces.
How to i check this to listen on the appropriate interface i thought this would be set up correctly by default?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.