LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-02-2003, 05:12 PM   #16
exodist
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,374

Rep: Reputation: 47

you make a good point. I never thaught about sendmails running as root, thank god sendmail only relays/recieves/send mail, and does not otpen it :-P but perhapse a message os a specific size can screw something
 
Old 09-05-2007, 12:13 AM   #17
craftycorner
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Smile firefox security

I thought spyware programs had to be installed. Program installation is a little more involved than in Windows where you just double click. Linux has package managers.
*
I use root for moving files between my two 'user' accounts and my Windows partition which is required as some of my hardware is not Linux compatible. There are the administrative chores such as updates plus the occasional install of a program that passes the 'smell' test of a trusted friend.
*
Anyone surfing in root is nuts.
*
Firefox/Mozilla comes with it's own bag of security. They've a list of plug-ins that aid the user in choosing what content they want and what they want blocked.
*
I do use root for my virus checking program. It allows me to check the whole disk with out going into each 'user' account and Windows partition which would take time...
*
Linux viruses are scarce as hen's teeth. However, I've deleted a good many Window's viruses from my email box and saved friends from pesky or ruinous infections from bugs that would just sit in my system.
 
Old 09-05-2007, 07:36 AM   #18
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422
Welcome to LQ!

While your contribution is nicely done, did you realize you were replying to a nearly 4 year old thread?
 
Old 09-05-2007, 07:44 AM   #19
vangelis
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Hellas
Distribution: Zenwalk 6.4
Posts: 337
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 30
lol I got the email notification for this thread and it was like I went back in time!
 
Old 09-05-2007, 09:35 AM   #20
unixfool
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Northern VA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OS X
Posts: 782
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 158Reputation: 158
Part of the problem, IMO, is that the OP is using RH9. That distribution is OLD...very old. Old enough to where he'd have issues with updating software packages. Based on that fact and the fact that the OP seems to be rather new to the Linux arena, I suggest something more supported...Fedora 7 or the latest version of CentOS, since he/she appears to hold RH in favor.

Other than that, the OP should offer more of the who/what/when/where so we can offer better support.

Just my .02...
 
Old 09-05-2007, 09:56 AM   #21
farslayer
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Distribution: linuxdebian
Posts: 7,249
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 191Reputation: 191
BajaNick, you mention you are running RH9, that distribution is several years old.. Are security updates still available for it ? While this latest event appears to be nothing more than a pop up advertising gimmick, you might want to ensure you have the latest security updates for your system, or better yet, update your distribution to something more current and better supported.

The last update I see available for RH9 is over a year old... 2006-07-27 http://www.fedoralegacy.org/updates/RH9/


[edit] Sigh I guess I should read Page 2 before replying with yet another redundant post. nothing like saying what's already been said.

Last edited by farslayer; 09-05-2007 at 09:58 AM.
 
Old 09-05-2007, 09:58 AM   #22
unixfool
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Northern VA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OS X
Posts: 782
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 158Reputation: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hangdog42 View Post
Welcome to LQ!

While your contribution is nicely done, did you realize you were replying to a nearly 4 year old thread?
Ouch! I didn't notice that! I feel dumb for even responding!
 
Old 09-06-2007, 03:05 AM   #23
Simon Bridge
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Waiheke NZ
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,211

Rep: Reputation: 198Reputation: 198
Quote:
Part of the problem, IMO, is that the OP is using RH9. That distribution is OLD...
Quote:
BajaNick, you mention you are running RH9, that distribution is several years old..
BajaNick was posting in '03, RH9 lasted until April 30, 2004. So it was quite current at the time.

The last zero-reply thread started by him was on 04-10-06 and the latest thread was This is A great online movie (sic) posted 08-22-07.

But you'd think he'd know better than to leave a thread dangling...
 
Old 09-06-2007, 06:26 AM   #24
unixfool
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Northern VA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OS X
Posts: 782
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 158Reputation: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Bridge View Post
BajaNick was posting in '03, RH9 lasted until April 30, 2004. So it was quite current at the time.
The reason I responded to the thread was that I thought the OP created the thread in the last few days. In retrospect, anyone could've made the same mistake (and did), irregardless of the OP using RH9, which was current back in 2004. At this point, and after I acknowledged my mistake, I don't think it matters when RH9 was current...the post is WAYYY old and I shouldn't have responded at all.
 
Old 09-08-2007, 05:25 AM   #25
craftycorner
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Talking Whoops

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hangdog42 View Post
Welcome to LQ!

While your contribution is nicely done, did you realize you were replying to a nearly 4 year old thread?
(Gets hit with a stupid stick LOL!)

Last edited by craftycorner; 09-08-2007 at 05:26 AM. Reason: added a char
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spyware On Linux dj9928 Linux - Software 2 04-16-2005 05:31 PM
Spyware and Linux? stunter Linux - Software 4 07-01-2004 02:04 PM
Can Linux have spyware? ProtoformX Linux - General 4 03-15-2004 06:51 AM
spyware in Linux? moger Linux - General 1 01-27-2004 04:39 PM
Linux and spyware mfarley Linux - General 3 08-14-2003 12:48 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration