Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
03-21-2003, 06:51 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Distribution: Debian testing.
Posts: 143
Rep:
|
iptables rule order
Hello .. would just like to clarify this with an iptables guru:
Should an ESTABLISHED,RELATED rule appear first in the rule list, or a "specific" rule?
such as:
iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 8000 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p udp --dport 27960 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
Should the ESTABLISHED,RELATED rule become first or last in the ruleset? Because it gets the most hits (when i do iptables -vL) so does it make sense to put it at the top??
Please note this is not my ruleset, nor is it complete, just using it to illustrate my question.
Cheers
|
|
|
03-21-2003, 07:34 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
|
I'm no iptables expert by any means, but my understanding is that as soon as iptables finds a rule that matches, it stops looking and goes on to the next packet. So in the example you've got, if you put ESTABLISHED,RELATED rule at the top, iptables would spend less time processing rules. Personally, I have pretty broad rules early in my table and then get more specific.
|
|
|
03-21-2003, 07:56 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Distribution: Debian testing.
Posts: 143
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yes, this is what I thought ...
Cheers
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|