Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Howdy. Is there a good program, or set of programs intended for scanning the logs on my computer to detect possible malicious activity? I'm curious now, b/c I just went through my httpd logs and found a huge number of:
A decent log scanner is LogSentry, by Psionic. It scans my logs every couple of hours and tells me the hostnames/IP addresses of anyone who scanned me, how many attempts there were, etc... it also sends me information about failed login attempts, various processes starting and stopping, stuff like that. I don't know if that is the sort of depth you are looking for... this is on my home system, so it is fine with me. It is just a collection of shell scripts they wrote so you don't have to. Also, their firewall program, PortSentry, works great. It can be used by itself, but works better when you use it as an interface to ipchains or iptables. It makes my life simpler.
What about all the stuff at snort.org? Any experience with that vs. portsentry? They have a lot of programs for scanning and evaluating the logs. Also looks like there's good support on their site, and frequent updates.
Portsentry only looks for connects on a port, where Snort actually scans for a signature.
This means that if Portsentry is used for adding blocking rules, you could D0S the box by spoofing souce addresses. Snort will actually scan if a signature matches any known malicious traffic. Even then it won't take action itself (it can't), you would need any of the contributed apps like Guardian to add blocking rules.
Earlier this year I found that reason enough to trade in Portsentry for Snort. Another reason is mr Roland doesn't seem to expand/develop Portsentry anymore.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.