Linux - NewsThis forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Would you believe Jim Allchin, Microsoft's group vice presidents in charge of platforms admitting that Linux is a winner? You should as those are his words spoken at a recent interview. The tone at Microsoft has changed dramatically and now Microsoft is making an attempt to paint itself as an underdog!
According to Allchin, most customers who buy a new computer outfitted with Linux instead of Windows are doing it solely as a cost-cutting measure. They avoid the Windows license fee at the cash register when they ask for systems with Linux preinstalled. Once they get the hardware home, however, that Linux OS is quickly erased and replaced with a pirated copy of Windows -- often within 24 hours.
I found it hard to believe that people are buying Linux machines only to avoid paying extra for Windows. I mean yeah there are going to be a few people that do it, but I dont think it is the only reason they are.
So, I did some searching, and I found four comparable machines (2 Linux pre-installed and 2 Windows pre-installed) from two different vendors and the Linux pre-installed were more expensive than the the Windows pre-installed by around $200 to $400. Granted the sample is very small, but I am to lazy to continue looking for more examples. Plus I do not want to be too tempted to purchase another machine.
I also would like to know how they know that people are "flipping" the OS's within 24 hours. Are they running a phone survey to new PC owners?
As far as the servers go, yeah MS is pretty much screwed.
Last edited by BugEyedMonkey; 05-05-2005 at 09:58 AM.
Here in Germany/Th?ringen, it's hard to find a PC, and even harder to find a laptop without that evil OS preinstalled. I've asked many times and in many stores, and I got the only reply: "No, you can't buy a computer without Windows."
So, if anyone says about "flipping" OSs, then only in the other direction
I bought a computer for me and another for my friend with Linux preinstalled. But i didn´t use them at all, instead i took an install CD and installed other linux. So, does this count?
btw, they were cheapest machines available.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.