Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
my main gaming platform (win xp sp2) is giving me problems and i might have to reinstall *roll eyes*. however, i need to go into the hdd to recover some of my config files etc.
is there a good livecd which would help me do this? i tried DSL (did not discover my mouse -- and i tried both ps2 and usb), knoppix and xubuntu (both can't seem to read my ntfs hdd?).
i am fine with not using X to do all of this, as long as i can copy the files to a usb memory stick.
My vote would go to Knoppix. It has very good hardware detection, and a very good web site with documentation and help. I like version 3.9, there is newer, but I had problems with udev on the latest version.
I have saved several XP systems using Knoppix. God knows, they needed it.
My vote would go to Knoppix. It has very good hardware detection, and a very good web site with documentation and help. I like version 3.9, there is newer, but I had problems with udev on the latest version.
I have saved several XP systems using Knoppix. God knows, they needed it.
Yep.., Knoppix, or maybe Mepis. I've also used Knoppix as a rescue CD on a hosed XP system. Worked well enough to let me get important files backed up. After that, I lost interest trying to"fix" it, and Format C:/s it was..
Knoppix is good for detecting different hardware, but I find I'm liking Slax a bit better. Since it's a bit more stripped down it boots and runs a lot faster (I'd say it's comparable to my ubuntu hard drive install). If all you need is to save some configuration files all the bells and whistles in knoppix are probably not useful.
I think Ubuntu is fabulous. It detects hardware and enables network connections so you can shoot files off to another remote system. This is really handy.
Once it boots up cd to the root directory:
cd /
Create a mount point like hd:
mkdir hd
Mount the drive with something like:
mount /dev/hda1 /hd
Normally the partition type is detected automatically but if it's not then the above command is something like:
mount -t reiserfs /dev/hda1 /hd
Of course if you have want to mount a different partition it's just:
mount /dev/hda2 /hd
Once a mount point is used you have to either create a new one or free up the old one before making another mount:
umount /dev/hda1
This unmounts your hda1 partition from hd if you did what I decribed above.
Another issue you can run into with distros like Ubuntu is that it requires sudo because there are no root logins. Just do a:
sudo su -
This will give you the necessary access to get your business done
i also vote for slax. like mcmillan says, it boots a lot faster. and it boots to a command prompt, too, no waiting for bloaty X to load (the last version i tried, at least).
So do I. I only use Slackware, however, when it comes to hardware detection I've ended up using Ubuntu because I don't want to figure out how to make things work in Slackware when I only want to get the files out. It's faster to wait for slow Ubuntu, then to figure out the hardware problem for yourself. If I'm not even going to keep the system I don't care to trouble shoot. Remember it's just recovery.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.