Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!


  Search this Thread
Old 03-13-2006, 11:47 AM   #1
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 232

Rep: Reputation: 30
Whats better, x86 or i686

Hi, I have an AMD 64 X2 4800+ processor (64bit), but I want to install a 32bit linux distro (Gentoo). However there are two types of initial binaries, x86 and i686. Now I think these refer to the instructions the CPU is capable, and as I have a cutting-edge CPU it supports everything (thats common), so which version, x86 or i686, has newer instruction sets, or is better suited to my processor.

Thanks in advance, Buck.
Old 03-13-2006, 11:52 AM   #2
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere on the String
Distribution: Debian Wheezy (x86)
Posts: 6,094

Rep: Reputation: 272Reputation: 272Reputation: 272
Probably i686. ix86 is sometimes a bulkier package because it supports 386,486,586, and 686. Since yours is newer, it should be 686.
Old 03-13-2006, 11:57 AM   #3
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 232

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I also found out from the "similar threads" at the bottom of the page. x86 is more backward compatable (which I don't need, so i686 for me)
Old 03-13-2006, 05:59 PM   #4
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Somerset, England
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Slackware 10.0, Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 1,938

Rep: Reputation: 55
The gentoo website has only x86 listed, not i686. Anyway, x86 refers to the architecture, i686 refers to the processor family. Architecture would be x86, alpha, SPARC, PPC, etc...subarchitecture would be i386, i486, pentium, pentium 2, pentium 3, duron, athlon, etc... x86 and i686 don't refer to the same piece of information. A backward compatible set (as the poster above put it) would be i386, not x86 (though if the program lists only the architecture then an x86 package could well be for i386, but it might be compiled for i686).

Also, a backward compatible binary wouldn't be any bulkier (as he puts it), it just means the code doesn't use optimisations designed for newer chips, such as MMX instructions, so it can run on anything 386 or better.
Old 03-13-2006, 08:53 PM   #5
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,553

Rep: Reputation: 52
i'm not exactly sure so check the docs for your version of gcc it's all spelled out clearly in there
for that chip on a 32 bit system you should use

if you use an older instruction set like say i686 from 20 years ago you waste your processor.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i x86, i386, i486, i586, i686 am confused?!! oldi Linux - Hardware 5 10-04-2006 09:04 AM
2.6.9-5.EL-hugemem-i686, 2.6.9-5.EL-i686, 2.6.9-5.EL-smp-i686 , Which? arsham Linux - General 2 05-07-2005 11:21 PM
2.6.9-5.EL-hugemem-i686, 2.6.9-5.EL-i686, 2.6.9-5.EL-smp-i686 , Which? arsham Linux - Enterprise 1 05-07-2005 07:20 PM
X86, i386, i686, atholon? mdk Linux - Newbie 2 08-19-2004 05:06 AM
is celeron 500 an i686 ? if so how to move from i386 to i686 raft Linux - Hardware 1 12-22-2003 06:58 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration