Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Special Thanks to DavidMcCann for understanding my situation and suggesting few examples.
Thank you!
I'd repeat my point about looking at documentation first. So, reading the description of the installer should warn anyone that Fedora is not for beginners. Similarly, I like Black Lab, but there was no documentation at all, last time I looked. Vine is great, provided you can read Japanese or can do without any instructions.
Also, don't get a specialist distro for general use. I've always liked Puppy, but it's designed to run from RAM: a conventional installation is a security risk on any computer with an internet connection.
There's no perfect distro for a newbie, you're simply going to have to try the ones that seem interesting. Second please read first, ask google second, ask the forums third there is so much great documentation out there that you should be able to solve your problems by reading.
Asking this question on a Linux forum is one of the biggest cans of worms you can open. My first Dristo was Mandriva and used it for years. I'm now using Manjaro Xfce. IMHO I consider Xfce to be one of the best desktop environments for new Linux users.
So when it stops "support," any bright ideas then?
I ram windows XP for like 4ever with no support.
most people run windows with no support when it is available.
that is what help forums are 4.
divers to get it running on a "new" install would be the hardest in finding them, just got a dig for them on the internet is all.
whense it is installed and running whats to support??
all of them updates are mostly taking up hard drive space security patches.
I ram windows XP for like 4ever with no support.
most people run windows with no support when it is available.
that is what help forums are 4.
divers to get it running on a "new" install would be the hardest in finding them, just got a dig for them on the internet is all.
whense it is installed and running whats to support??
all of them updates are mostly taking up hard drive space security patches.
what type of support U B takin' bout?
He's talking about things like, oh I don't know...security updates...exploit patches...new versions of applications...things like that. If that doesn't concern you, then just pat yourself on the back for being bot fodder.
Distribution: Primarily Deb/Ubuntu, and some CentOS
Posts: 829
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx
I ram windows XP for like 4ever with no support.
most people run windows with no support when it is available.
that is what help forums are 4.
divers to get it running on a "new" install would be the hardest in finding them, just got a dig for them on the internet is all.
whense it is installed and running whats to support??
all of them updates are mostly taking up hard drive space security patches.
He's talking about things like, oh I don't know...security updates...exploit patches...new versions of applications...things like that. If that doesn't concern you, then just pat yourself on the back for being bot fodder.
I don't stay up late night worrying about such things as is my security updates current cuz I'd hate for someone to hack my laptop and get a hold of all of my free "porn" I got off the free porn sights that are much eaier to access then trying to hack into my computer to get. LOL
I don't keep personal information on it neither. I have nothing to loose -- most they can do is disrup me to the point I'd have to just re-install my os. NO Big Deal...
btw I don't use XP NE more - now - I run Linux full speed now.
the interesting thing is for the whole time XP was supported it still could not plug up all of the leaks it had in it, same thing goes for all of their other versions. it is in a constant updating status for ever updating security leaks.
you have to put a side at least 10GB to cover all of the updates..
I tried to use Ubuntu 15.04, but to may errors, realizing that it's only beta, I went to 14.04 because I have read that was error free .....LOL not so!
Maybe Mint, so I figured I would download Mint and use it in Virtualbox to see it I like it, but no luck, I get error message that says: Virtualbox will not start because VT-x is disabled in the Bios.
I went to the Bios and looked for VT-x but I'm Still looking because I can not find it, so I'm beginning to wonder, do these developers know these problems exist when they release these distro's ?.....
I sincerely hope that I am in the correct page this time for asking questions regarding a question because the last time in here I was criticized for asking a question, but it seemed to me, the person who levelled the criticism didn't know the answer to my question, in my humble opinion that's why I was criticized......
Last edited by joeinslw; 02-04-2016 at 02:36 PM.
Reason: I was critized before for not being on the correct page.
Distribution: Primarily Deb/Ubuntu, and some CentOS
Posts: 829
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeinslw
Virtualbox will not start because VT-x is disabled in the Bios.
I went to the Bios and looked for VT-x but I'm Still looking because I can not find it, so I'm beginning to wonder, do these developers know these problems exist when they release these distro's ?.....
If your computer doesnt support virtualization, then using a a virtual machine will not work. This has nothing to do with the developers of any Linux distribution.
Please post your laptop model and BIOS version. Then we can see if it does or not. Have you checked the manufacuter's website to see if there any firmware updates?
Error Free? Come on, dude. When something doesnt seem to work, you will have to try to fix it. Use Google Search, there's tons of info on fixing Linux/hardware issues.
I tried to use Ubuntu 15.04, but to may errors, realizing that it's only beta, I went to 14.04 because I have read that was error free .....LOL not so!
Maybe Mint, so I figured I would download Mint and use it in Virtualbox to see it I like it, but no luck, I get error message that says: Virtualbox will not start because VT-x is disabled in the Bios.
yeeeeeeP I had to turn on my virtualization through my BIOS before I could run VBox.
Errer Free? Come on, dude. When something doesnt seem to work, you will have to try to fix it. Use Google Search, there's tons of info on fixing Linux/hardware issues.
This is what seperates Linux from Windows or MAC OS and a like
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.