What are the differentboot loaders available on linux and their differences please?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Yep!! i have done it...GRUB / LILO but never found and satisafactory explanation and had anxiety to know if there are any more available whihc am not aware of.....thanks
GRUB, lilo, etc. One difference I know of is that if you use lilo you should make a separate /boot partition of type ext2, otherwise lilo may not be able to boot the kernel. I think this is because it stores the exact address where the kernel is located and if the filesystem changes this, which a journaled filesystem may, it will not find it anymore. GRUB is also faster at booting than lilo from my tests.
GRUB, lilo, etc. One difference I know of is that if you use lilo you should make a separate /boot partition of type ext2, otherwise lilo may not be able to boot the kernel. I think this is because it stores the exact address where the kernel is located and if the filesystem changes this, which a journaled filesystem may, it will not find it anymore. GRUB is also faster at booting than lilo from my tests.
I've never had problems booting my Slackware systems using lilo without a separate /boot parition. In fact, my current set up uses XFS and /boot is a directory in /.
Lilo is the older of the two which traditionalists swear by. Simple and effective.
Grub is the newer. It has more fancy things like nice boot splash screens which I think Lilo doesn't support. Lilo might also have more problem with booting external USB pen drives (and other things like the previous post indicates).
Grub and Lilo is basically the only two. Not heard of any other ones. People like IBM might have their own specialised things, but only these two are used by the wider community.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.