Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Heh heh, yeah it's possible. You are only limited by your HD size. As for whether it's worthwhile, you have to decide yourself. Do you want to keep one "main" distro then try a number of others to see if you like them? If so it is worthwhile.
I do it. I like it. I have Mandrake, 2 slack's, LFS, and XP, spread across 2 hard drives, randomly.
1 of the slacks is my main distro, Mandy is for helpin people out who run RPM distros and Mandy specifically, LFS is hopefully someday going to be my main distro if I ever get the time to install a few necessary things. XP is on there to mock me, Not really, I have XP on there for troubleshooting, to see if there is a problem if it's OS specific, and also for P2P since I can't find a linux client that is as good as Grokster.
Yes, it is definitely worth while, and sometimes helps to fix problems that I create
Distribution: RH 6.2, Gen2, Knoppix,arch, bodhi, studio, suse, mint
Posts: 3,304
Rep:
i've got a bazillion distros too. several in different
partitions, and about 10 in one partition. I learn new
stuff from each distro. A lot of times i can't get some
software to work in one, so i'll try it in several others.
i've got several scripts where i can run several of
them without rebooting. there are a few multi-linux
howto's on the web. Do a search.
Originally posted by whansard i've got a bazillion distros too. several in different
partitions, and about 10 in one partition.
10 in one partition? That's gotta be pretty rough specifying the different /bin's and and libs to each program to do that. Again, how would you do something like that, you chrooting again here? And hot-swapping kernels, I've heard from a reliable source this is pretty much a no-go, and not worth it to make it a go. Some SMP machines were tested with this supposedly, and it was successful, but totally not worth the work to do it, and it's just as easy to reboot.
I would really be interested in how you do it, and maybe even a pick at the script mentioned above.
Distribution: RH 6.2, Gen2, Knoppix,arch, bodhi, studio, suse, mint
Posts: 3,304
Rep:
here's an extra nasty;
start your version of x,
then go out to a terminal,
and do all the chroot stuff like above,
then startx -- :1
and you'll probably be running both x's at once.
one under control-alt-f7, the other on control-alt-f8
when i first set up this big mess up i started up
5 different ones. X's from different distros running
from f7-f11.
What are your partitioning schemes for running multiple distributions on one hard drive?
I want to setup a box like this to try Slackware, SuSE, Red Hat, Debian, Gentoo, OpenBSD and keep one for WinME or WinXP for things you can't do in Linux or BSD yet.
Distribution: RH 6.2, Gen2, Knoppix,arch, bodhi, studio, suse, mint
Posts: 3,304
Rep:
this is mine
Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 10011 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 260 2088418+ 6 FAT16
/dev/hda2 1000 2500 12056782+ c Win95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/hda3 8001 10011 16153357+ c Win95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/hda4 2501 8000 44178750 85 Linux extended
/dev/hda5 2501 3200 5622718+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda6 3201 3400 1606468+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda7 3401 3600 1606468+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda8 3601 4300 5622718+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda9 4301 4999 5614686 83 Linux
/dev/hda10 5000 8000 24105501 83 Linux
Partition table entries are not in disk order
notice the type 85 linux extended? its for getting widnows to ignore it. If i use a regular extended
type 5, i think windows will sit around trying to choke
on it. also, see the apparently unused space from
cylinder 261 to 999? Thats where i keep openbsd,
netbsd, and freebsd. like freebsd is from 261 to
599, so if i want to use it, i remove entry 3 in the partition
table and add back an entry for cylinder 261 through
599, make it type a5, i think. I would have to go look.
and then reboot to it. think its an ugly thing to do, but
its the only way i could figure to have access to my whole
drive from every os, and have those bsd's on one hard
disk. Its been that way for 2 years, and i haven't lost
the stuff yet. Its backed up to cdrw's anyway. I don't
have time to type the names of all the os's in there, but
its a lot.
What are your partitioning schemes for running multiple distributions on one hard drive?
I want to setup a box like this to try Slackware, SuSE, Red Hat, Debian, Gentoo, OpenBSD and keep one for WinME or WinXP for things you can't do in Linux or BSD yet.
That's a pretty impressive lineup, you really don't need alot of space unless you are going to install X on each one, along with a lot of bloated programs. Anywhere, here's my latest scheme:
Code:
Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 4866 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 522 4192933+ b Win95 FAT32
/dev/hda2 523 4867 34895931 5 Extended
Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary:
phys=(1023, 87, 21) should be (1023, 254, 63)
/dev/hda5 523 1907 11124981 83 Linux
/dev/hda6 1908 3279 11020527 83 Linux
/dev/hda7 3280 4867 12750265+ 83 Linux
Disk /dev/hdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 2498 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdb1 * 1 814 6538423+ 83 Linux
/dev/hdb2 815 2499 13527796+ 5 Extended
/dev/hdb5 815 1464 5221093+ 83 Linux
/dev/hdb6 1852 2499 5198031 b Win95 FAT32
/dev/hdb7 1465 1851 3108546 83 Linux
Partition table entries are not in disk order
I know very little about extended and primary, logical things. I didn't even pay attention to that when setting up my scheme, and have had no problems since then.
Oh, and here's my fstab so you can see where each is mounted and such:
Whoosh - that's the noise of this thread going straight over my head. I have enough of a problem trying to learn one distro, let alone all the other one's!!!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.