Seeking good distro for low RAM, that could be used by 8 year old or grandma
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
For Mint Xfce, the system idled at 160MB on my 32-bit machine.
Slackware is easy to install: the installer is not flashy but it's simple and logical. The problem is that there's very little software installed and the DVD is the complete repository. If you need anything else, it has to be compiled. Slackware has a system that makes this an easier and more reliable procedure than usual, but it's still a job that has to be done.
Hi everyone, I'm looking for a lightweight distro that will run well in 512MB of RAM, for my 8 year old daughter's netbook. Sort of that proverbial "OS you would choose for your grandmother".
The netbook is an eeePC, single core Atom, I think, running at around 1ghz, has 512MB of RAM, and a 1024x600 (and 1024x768 with vertical panning) screen resolution.
I have a very old laptop with lots of hardware issues. I installed Debian "netinstall" CD on it (without installing anything additional) and I am running openbox or something like that. Using the same image, you can customise it with Enlightenment or something more user friendly for GUI.
The image is about 300mb and contains the core Debian packages only.
Yes, Slackware is a great choice, but as long as you like spending time researching and learning. Slackware does not resolve dependecies nor warn you about them if they don't exists. It'll be up to you to figure out what packages needs what. The reason slackware is like that, so it can be highly customizable and intended for the more advanced uses. However they do welcome new users and include slackbook that has alot of information for you.
However like I said before, I have Debian running on 64MB of Ram and P3 Processor while it couldn't do much, it can be even lighter. But you will need more ram regardless if you want to browse web etc. I've install Debian Minimal (CD Disk 1) and uncheck all options when it ask for addition software to install.
Then just run as root
# apt-get install xfce4 xfce4-goodies iceweasel
to add a software center
# apt-get install software-center
This will give you a lightweight desktop running 160MB of Ram and a web broswer, Iceweasel if firefox but rebranding to meat debian requirements.
Please note, use your regular user account to browse web and everyday use.
That's pretty good. Is it really easy to install and set up? if it's simple, installs and just works, maybe I should take a look at it.
As DavidMcCann said,
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMcCann
Slackware is easy to install: the installer is not flashy but it's simple and logical. The problem is that there's very little software installed and the DVD is the complete repository. If you need anything else, it has to be compiled. Slackware has a system that makes this an easier and more reliable procedure than usual, but it's still a job that has to be done.
But with the large collections of tutorials and how-to out there you can compile any software easily.
As DavidMcCann said,
But with the large collections of tutorials and how-to out there you can compile any software easily.
ROTFL - ok thanks, but no thanks! with so many distros out there, I don't need the hassle. I want to live life, not to give my life to maintaining my computers.
Thank you for making me feel welcome, and I am sorry for asking for help on here.
Your initial post wasn't asking for help. But I see you went back and edited it so that now it is a request for help. Smart move. You will get more help that way. You initially said, quote, "Please, I'm not interested in learning about all other distros under the sun..."
But now you have opened your mind up and are willing to consider distros that people might recommend. In that case, I would probably recommend Slackware. It's fairly lean, but you may need to do a bit more work setting it up the way you want it. The default installation is not difficult at all, but the on-going maintenance/upgrade is maybe a tad more difficult than other distros. But what you get in return is a quite solid system that is tailored to your needs.
Another alternative might be to install a more "user friendly" distro (meaning heavier weight) on one of your other home computers in a VM. And then on your daughters netbook, install an ultra-slim distro where she'd only be running something like NoMachine NX to remotely access the heavier-weight distro running on that other computer. As a parent, this would also give you ultimate control over what she is allowed to do or not do with her computer, as you would have the VM resident on your computer and totally under your control.
Yes, Slackware is a great choice, but as long as you like spending time researching and learning. Slackware does not resolve dependecies nor warn you about them if they don't exists. It'll be up to you to figure out what packages needs what.
Slackware for a child would be a bit much I would think. Great distro, just seems like teaching an 8 year old about install prefixes when all they want to do is play wack-a-mole would be a bit much. Would be comedic to see an 8 year old walk up and ask about some odd linked lib so she could get ECDSA working in ssl cause disney wont let her log in other wise.
snicker...snicker. Why not just make your own ubuntu spin using one of those " make my install cd " tools? You install all you want and then it builds a cd from it. You could pin repos and packages as well. Any way, my 1 cent.
Not so often you need to do that with Slackware. If you want something that has neither a ready-made package or a SlackBuild available, then there's src2pkg: does what the name says, builds an installable package from source.
Slackware for a child would be a bit much I would think. Great distro, just seems like teaching an 8 year old about install prefixes when all they want to do is play wack-a-mole would be a bit much. Would be comedic to see an 8 year old walk up and ask about some odd linked lib so she could get ECDSA working in ssl cause disney wont let her log in other wise.
snicker...snicker. Why not just make your own ubuntu spin using one of those " make my install cd " tools? You install all you want and then it builds a cd from it. You could pin repos and packages as well. Any way, my 1 cent.
"./configure --prefix=/whats/a/user/local"
Why in the world would you teach an 8 yo. how to install stuff?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.