[SOLVED] No space to create more partitions, but there is free space
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Guess I'm still not not understanding how/when you should use primary vs. non-primary, and doing some reading looks like you can/should mark one partition as "active" somehow too?
The basic thing is that only four primary partitions are allowed. One of these can be an Extended partition in which multiple logical partitions may be created. You can google to get more detailed info on the history of primary/extended/logical partitioning if you are interested.As far as the necessity, as indicated above it doesn't matter whether you use a primary or logical partition for Linux. AFAIK, you still need at least the boot files on a primary partition for a windows system to boot. A windows system AFAIK still needs to be have an active/bootable partition marked and this is not necessary for Linux
Guess I'm still not not understanding how/when you should use primary vs. non-primary, and doing some reading looks like you can/should mark one partition as "active" somehow too?
"active" is also a non Linux (at least non Grub) concept.
I'm pretty sure Centos still uses some form of the Grub boot loader and very sure it still uses some boot loader that doesn't care about primary vs. logical and doesn't care about active.
A Windows boot loader needs to load part of itself from a primary partition. Windows compatible MBR code loads that part of the boot loader from the "active" primary partition. Windows then expects that its boot code was loaded from the active partition. Various multi-boot systems (including Grub) have ways of patching which partition is "active" at boot time in case you have more than one version of Windows or other non Linux OS that cares about "active". But all that only matters if you are multi-booting multiple OS's and some of them are not Linux (it only is complicated enough to need your attention when more than one of the OS's is non Linux).
But sometimes the hardware does. My laptop (Linux only) refuses to boot if there is not one partition with the boot-flag. It doesn't matter at all which partition is marked, but the flag has to be there.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.