Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The basic idea has to do with instruction scheduling and instruction set.
You want to tell the compiler what kind of CPU you have so it knows how to schedule instructions efficiently. Some CPUs have 2ALU units and 2FPU units, some have 3/3 some have 4/3, etc. The idea is you want the compiler to reorder instructions so as to mix the propper number of ALU and FPU instructions. If the order was 32 fpu and then 32 ALU later, you would only be using half your CPUs processing units. If you could mix those same instructions into 8 4+4 batches, you could better utilize the CPU. The real story is much more complex, but you get the idea. This is why you would want to choose the closest match to your actual processor.
Also, some CPUs have support for additional instruction sets like MMX, SSE, 3DNow, etc. I think there have even been changes in the standard x86 line (386,486,686,etc). If your processor supports these instructions, it would be nice to tell the kernel (and compiler) so it could take advantage of them. I'm not sure what exactly i686 includes, but again, you get the idea, and you want to choose the closest match to your actual CPU.
Each one is a newer instruction set, i686 contains instructions that i586 doesn't support, and i586 contains things that i486 didn't support, etc. i686 is Pentium Pro and better; almost all x86 computers you can find today are i686 or above
Well, interesting note visaris, like you said, I got the point.....
Thanks to you also spooon.
So, the basicly idea of this improvement, is to help the kernel to satisface the instructions suported by the processor, but, this affect the packages which install using 386? or i'm complity lost and has nothing to do with this? jajaja
I mean, if I have a kernel 686, and install a package which comes in 386, this package is recompiled to reach the 686 structure or simply, run using only 386 support?
The i386 packages have been compiled to run on any 386 (or higher) processor so they won't have the additional instructions (MMX etc.) supported on 586 or 686 processors. What processor the kernel was compiled for does not make any difference to userland applications (other than a snappier kernel will make the system as a whole feel more responsive).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.